Fourier Transform of One-Sided Convolution

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the Fourier transform of a one-sided convolution integral, specifically the expression \(\int^{t}_{0}f(t-\tau)g(\tau)d\tau\). Participants explore the relationship between this integral and known convolution theorems, particularly in comparison to the two-sided convolution integral.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the existence of a convolution theorem for the Fourier transform of the one-sided convolution integral.
  • Another participant suggests looking into the Laplace transform as a potential avenue for understanding the convolution, referencing its properties.
  • A participant expresses the need for the Fourier transform specifically, noting challenges with switching the order of integration due to bounds that arise in the one-sided case.
  • One reply proposes that an equivalent Fourier transform could be reconstructed from a Laplace transform, but the reasoning behind this remains unclear.
  • There is a suggestion that the convolution might relate to a specific time window in a continuous stream, although this reasoning is questioned for its simplicity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the existence or formulation of a convolution theorem for the one-sided case, and multiple competing views and approaches are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the implications of switching integration bounds and the relationship between Fourier and Laplace transforms, which remains unresolved.

thrillhouse86
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Can anyone tell me if there is a convolution theorem for the Fourier transform of:
[tex] \int^{t}_{0}f(t-\tau)g(\tau)d\tau[/tex]

I know the convolution theorem for the Fourier Transform of:
[tex] \int^{\infty}_{-\infty}f(t-\tau)g(\tau)d\tau[/tex]

But I can't seem to find (or proove!) anything about the first one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Ray,

yeah I've noticed that Laplace transform one, but I really need the Fourier transform of this one sided one. I was hoping that the heaviside function would kill the -ve bounds of my Fourier Transform so that it would look like a Laplace transform, but in order to do that I need to switch the order of integration, and the process of doing that gives me annoying bounds on the integral.
 
I don't understand, but you can reconstruct an equivalent Fourier transform from a Laplace transform.
Ah I think I understand; maybe you want to convolve over the last three seconds in an ongoing stream? If that is right then letting I=intergal(fg,a..(a+t)) you can do I=intergal(fg,a+t)-integral(fg,a) which can be accomplisher by (1-exp(-it)).
But this seems too easy: (1-exp(i*t*s)) F(s)G(s)
Ray
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K