Fourier transform of the sawtooth function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Fourier transform of the sawtooth function defined as h(t) = t for 0 < t < 1 and h(t) = 0 elsewhere. Two methods for calculating the Fourier transform H(f) are presented, leading to different results. The first method incorrectly applies the Fourier transform to the function k(t) = t over all real numbers, while the second method correctly uses the definition of h(t). The discrepancy arises from the improper application of the Fourier transform to the wrong function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier transforms and their properties
  • Familiarity with integration techniques, specifically integration by parts
  • Knowledge of the sinc function and Dirac delta function
  • Basic concepts of piecewise functions and their representations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Fourier transform, focusing on piecewise functions
  • Learn about the application of integration by parts in Fourier analysis
  • Explore the relationship between rectangular pulses and sawtooth functions
  • Investigate the implications of the Dirac delta function in signal processing
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, electrical engineers, and students studying signal processing or Fourier analysis who seek to deepen their understanding of Fourier transforms applied to piecewise functions.

jashua
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Let the sawtooth function be defined as follows:

h(t) = t, 0<t<1,
h(t) = 0, elsewhere

The problem is two explain the reason for difference between the following two forms of the Fourier transform of h(t), which is denoted as H(f).

First method is straightforward, i.e., use the Fourier transform. Hence, we have:

H(f)= int (-inf to inf) t*exp(-j*2*pi*f*t) dt
H(f)= int (0 to 1) t*exp(-j*2*pi*f*t) dt

Then, using integration by part, we get (skipping some tedious steps)

H(f)= 1/(j*2*pi*f) * [sinc(f)*exp(-j*pi*f) - exp(-j*2*pi*f)].

On the other hand, if we think the sawtooth function h(t) as the integral of a rectangular pulse g(t), which is given as:

g(t)=1, 0<t<1,
g(t)=0, elsewhere,

such that h(t)=int (-inf to t) g(t) dt, then, using Fourier property (integration in the time domain), we get the following result:

H(f)=1/(j*2*pi*f) * sinc(f)*exp(-j*pi*f) + 1/2*dirac(f).

As you see these two results are different. Why?.. What is the mistake? Any help will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Is

\int_{-\infty}^2 g(t)\,dt

equal to h(2)?
 
Ops..! got it :)

So,

g(t) = rect(t-1/2) - dirac(t-1).

many thanks vela.
 
jashua said:
Let the sawtooth function be defined as follows:

h(t) = t, 0<t<1,
h(t) = 0, elsewhere

The problem is two explain the reason for difference between the following two forms of the Fourier transform of h(t), which is denoted as H(f).

First method is straightforward, i.e., use the Fourier transform. Hence, we have:

H(f)= int (-inf to inf) t*exp(-j*2*pi*f*t) dt
H(f)= int (0 to 1) t*exp(-j*2*pi*f*t) dt

Then, using integration by part, we get (skipping some tedious steps)

H(f)= 1/(j*2*pi*f) * [sinc(f)*exp(-j*pi*f) - exp(-j*2*pi*f)].

On the other hand, if we think the sawtooth function h(t) as the integral of a rectangular pulse g(t), which is given as:

g(t)=1, 0<t<1,
g(t)=0, elsewhere,

such that h(t)=int (-inf to t) g(t) dt, then, using Fourier property (integration in the time domain), we get the following result:

H(f)=1/(j*2*pi*f) * sinc(f)*exp(-j*pi*f) + 1/2*dirac(f).

As you see these two results are different. Why?.. What is the mistake? Any help will be appreciated.

Your first H(f) = int (-inf to inf) t*exp(-j*2*pi*f*t) dt is not the F.T of the sawtooth function h(t); it is the F.T of the function k(t) = t for all t in R. Of course, your second form H(f)= int (0 to 1) t*exp(-j*2*pi*f*t) dt is correct for h(t).

RGV
 
thank you very much for your correction in my question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K