Fraction of the initial kinetic energy is transferred?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the fraction of initial kinetic energy transferred during an elastic collision between a 3.16 g object moving at 24.3 cm/s and a stationary 6.32 g object. The final velocity of the first object after the collision is determined to be -8.1 cm/s. Participants clarify that the kinetic energy (KE) formula is KE = mv²/2, and the fraction of kinetic energy transferred to the second object is calculated using the ratio of final to initial kinetic energy, specifically KEf/KEi.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of elastic collisions
  • Familiarity with the kinetic energy formula KE = mv²/2
  • Basic knowledge of conservation of momentum
  • Ability to perform unit conversions (grams to kilograms, cm/s to m/s)
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about conservation of momentum in elastic collisions
  • Study the derivation of kinetic energy formulas
  • Explore examples of elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Investigate the impact of mass and velocity on kinetic energy transfer
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of kinetic energy and momentum in collisions.

DrMcDreamy
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is a 2 part question and I already solved for part I. Part II is what I don't get.

a) A 3.16 g object moving to the right at 24.3 cm/s makes an elastic head-on-collision with a 6.32 g object that is initially at rest. The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s2 . 24.3 cm/s 3.16 g 6.32 g Find the velocity of the first object immediately after the collision. Answer in units of cm/s. answer: -8.1 cm/s

b) What fraction of the initial kinetic energy is transferred to the 6.32 g object?

Homework Equations



Would I use: KE=\frac{mv<sup>2</sup>}{2} ?

The Attempt at a Solution



KE=\frac{(6.32 g)(24.3 cm/s)<sup>2</sup>}{2} = 1866

We never did this in lecture so I'm not sure if I am right or wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi DrMcDreamy! :smile:

(in LaTeX, you must use ^ not SUP :wink:)

Yes, kinetic energy (of a non-rotating body) is always mv2/2 :smile:

(though in this case, I think you've mixed up the m of one body with the v of another)
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi DrMcDreamy! :smile:

(in LaTeX, you must use ^ not SUP :wink:)

Yes, kinetic energy (of a non-rotating body) is always mv2/2 :smile:

(though in this case, I think you've mixed up the m of one body with the v of another)


Im new o:), thank you. So it would be:

KE= \frac{(6.32 g)(-8.1 cm/s)^2}{2}

since I want the fraction of the intial kinetic energy of that is transferred to the 6.32 g object?
 
Hi DrMcDreamy! :smile:
DrMcDreamy said:
KE= \frac{(6.32 g)(-8.1 cm/s)^2}{2}

since I want the fraction of the intial kinetic energy of that is transferred to the 6.32 g object?

I'm getting confused :confused:

The 6.32 g object is stationary beforehand, and after the collision the other object has a speed of 8.1 cm/s.

So the other object's https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=132" after the collision is 3.16*(8.1)2/2 ergs, and before the collision it was 3.16*(24.3)2/2 ergs, which is 9 times as much …

so what fraction of the initial kinetic energy is transferred to the 6.32 g object?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tiny-tim said:
Hi DrMcDreamy! :smile:

I'm getting confused :confused:

The 6.32 g object is stationary beforehand, and after the collision the other object has a speed of 8.1 cm/s.

So the other object's https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=132" after the collision is 3.16*(8.1)2/2 ergs, and before the collision it was 3.16*(24.3)2/2 ergs, which is 9 times as much …

so what fraction of the initial kinetic energy is transferred to the 6.32 g object?

I'm sorry I confused you! I figured it out, Its supposed to be \frac{KEf}{KEi}

Here my work:

attachment.php?attachmentid=30239&stc=1&d=1291152912.jpg
 

Attachments

  • #10.jpg
    #10.jpg
    22.9 KB · Views: 2,025
Last edited by a moderator:
yes, that's the right result :smile:

(but why didn't you use the 8.1 in the answer to part a) ?)
 
tiny-tim said:
yes, that's the right result :smile:

(but why didn't you use the 8.1 in the answer to part a) ?)

Because the -8.1 is the velocity from the first object and its asking for the fraction of the initial kinetic energy that is transferred to the 6.32 g object, which is the second object. The -8.1 cm/s is the final velocity of the first object.
 
DrMcDreamy said:
Because the -8.1 is the velocity from the first object and its asking for the fraction of the initial kinetic energy that is transferred to the 6.32 g object, which is the second object. The -8.1 cm/s is the final velocity of the first object.

But it would be much easier to use the 8.1 …

the fraction of KE transferred is 1 - the fraction kept, so that's 1 - KEf/KEi, both for the first object

the advantage of this is that since all the parameters are the same, except for the speed, you don't need to do a lot of multiplying

you just say that the ratio of the speeds is 1/3, so the ratio of the KEs is … ? :smile:
 
How do we solve the first part of the question?
 
  • #10
welcome to pf!

hi bulldogGHS! welcome to pf! :smile:
bulldogGHS said:
How do we solve the first part of the question?

use conservation equations …

show us what you get :smile:

(gravity is irrelevant)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K