MHB Free Body Diagram Solve Problem: Find Force Normal

leprofece
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
SOLVE THIS PROBLEM View attachment 3071
And this is the figure View attachment 3072

I need the free body diagram because the book solve this problem in this way
the force normsl is n = fcosx
the verticall componente is fsenx = w + miuN
why does the fr is vertical in this case?
 

Attachments

  • Dibujo.JPG
    Dibujo.JPG
    7.3 KB · Views: 123
  • Dibujo2.JPG
    Dibujo2.JPG
    2.7 KB · Views: 113
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It'd be more helpful if you were more clear with your question...or fix the typo's in your sentence.

We have to look at the forces in the $x$ and $y$ direction, which you can find by drawing a free-body diagram.

Acting in the $x$ direction, we have the force of normal, and the force applied by the brush in the $x$ direction.
$$F_x=F_{bx}-F_N$$
$$=F(\cos\left({53.1^{\circ}}\right)-F_N=0$$

Similarly for $y$:
$$F_y=F_{by}-F_f-F_g$$
$$=F(\sin\left({53.1^{\circ}}\right))-F_f-F_g$$

What is your question again? :confused:

EDIT: It seems as though you want clarification of the free-body diagram. The window washer applies a force on the brush that is $53.1$ degrees from the horizontal, which we can break into its constituent $x$ and $y$ vectors. We also have the force of gravity acting downwards, and because the brush is pushed against the wall, we also have the force of normal and friction.
 
Last edited:
Rido12 said:
It'd be more helpful if you were more clear with your question...or fix the typo's in your sentence.

We have to look at the forces in the $x$ and $y$ direction, which you can find by drawing a free-body diagram.

Acting in the $x$ direction, we have the force of normal, and the force applied by the brush in the $x$ direction.
$$F_x=F_{bx}-F_N$$
$$=F(\cos\left({53.1^{\circ}}\right)-F_N=0$$

Similarly for $y$:
$$F_y=F_{by}-F_f-F_g$$
$$=F(\sin\left({53.1^{\circ}}\right))-F_f-F_g$$

What is your question again? :confused:

EDIT: It seems as though you want clarification of the free-body diagram. The window washer applies a force on the brush that is $53.1$ degrees from the horizontal, which we can break into its constituent $x$ and $y$ vectors. We also have the force of gravity acting downwards, and because the brush is pushed against the wall, we also have the force of normal and friction.

Yeah I want the drawing or the plot of the free body diagram of the problem That is I required or asked
 
Okay! What do you have on your free body diagram so far? :confused:
 
\partial \nabla

Here you are my free body diagram as you see we disagree in x axe because you have f cos53 - fr

The book says that fr must be in the vertical
accordin to book in the horizontal there is only one force f cos53 View attachment 3117
 

Attachments

  • images2.1.jpg
    images2.1.jpg
    86.6 KB · Views: 98
What are you defining "Fr" to be?

Your textbook isn't in disagreement to what I've said.

I said:

$F_x=F_{bx}-F_N$

$F_x$= zero:

$F(\cos\left({53.1^{\circ}}\right)-F_N=0$

So it simplifies to:

$F_N=F(\cos\left({53.1^{\circ}}\right))$

That is what you have in your first post.

I think you are referring to frictional force with $F_r$. I used $F_f$ instead. Your free body looks correct, and our equations are in agreement. We just used different variables :D
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top