Freon filled balloons go flat QUICKLY! Why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Querulous One
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flat
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of latex balloons filled with Freon 12 and Freon 134 compared to air. The original experiment revealed that Freon-filled balloons deflated significantly faster than those filled with air, leading to questions about the mechanisms behind this rapid deflation. It is noted that while chlorinated and fluorinated molecules typically have unreactive surfaces, allowing them to resist adsorption, Freon still escapes quickly from the balloons. The conversation explores the idea that Freon may not only be passing through nanopores but also dissolving in the rubber material of the balloon, contributing to its escape. Additionally, there is a brief debate regarding the molecular structure of Freon, with a clarification that carbon-12 is a boson due to its paired chlorines and fluorines, although this point is contested.
Querulous One
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Party balloons filled with Freon 12 go flat in a few hours, while helium takes two days. How can those larger molecules manage that (and they aren't even bosons)?
Years ago, I filled some latex party balloons with Freon 12. I haven't repeated the experiment with the Freon 134 that is available nowadays. It was fun to throw them around because Freon is so much heavier than air--you can throw them across the room and they land on the floor and stay there.
The first one went flat in about two hours. I of course assumed that the balloon had a very tiny leak or that I had tied the knot incorrectly, so I made a few more, along with some filled with air as experimental controls. The air-filled ones lasted days, as expected, but the Freon-filled ones again went nearly flat in two hours.
I know that chlorinated and fluorinated molecules have very unreactive surfaces, so you expect them to not be easily adsorbed onto solid surfaces, thus blocking nanopores. But helium is even less reactive--it can penetrate steel--and the single atom is certainly smaller than the Freon molecule. How does the Freon manage to escape so quickly?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
It is not only passing through nanopores, it is also about being dissolved in the rubber and then escaping on the other side.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes dextercioby, Vanadium 50, BillTre and 2 others
Querulous One said:
(and they aren't even bosons)?
Why do you say that? Two chlorines pair, and two fluorines pair, and carbon-12 is a boson, so the whole molecule is a boson.

(But I believe Borek is correct)
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
I'm trying to find a cheap DIY method to etch holes of various shapes through 0.3mm Aluminium sheet using 5-10% Sodium Hydroxide. The idea is to apply a resist to the Aluminium then selectively ablate it off using a diode laser cutter and then dissolve away the Aluminium using Sodium Hydroxide. By cheap I mean resists costing say £20 in small quantities. The Internet has suggested various resists to try including... Enamel paint (only survived seconds in the NaOH!) Acrylic paint (only...
Back
Top