Frequency Components of a Lightning Strike

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the frequency components of lightning strikes and their interaction with Faraday cages. Participants confirm that the skin effect, which causes alternating currents to flow near the surface of conductors, plays a significant role during lightning strikes. The lightning current waveform is characterized as a square wave with a fast rise time of approximately 25 microseconds, corresponding to a frequency of about 10 kHz, followed by a slower decay. The conversation also highlights the importance of both static charge rearrangement and the skin effect in determining safety within a Faraday cage during a lightning event.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the skin effect in electrical conductors
  • Knowledge of Faraday cages and their protective properties
  • Familiarity with current waveforms and their characteristics
  • Basic principles of lightning discharge and propagation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the characteristics of lightning waveforms and their frequency components
  • Study the skin effect and its implications in high-frequency electrical applications
  • Explore the physics of Faraday cages and their effectiveness against electromagnetic fields
  • Investigate the ionization process during lightning strikes and its impact on current flow
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, safety professionals, and anyone interested in the dynamics of lightning and electromagnetic shielding.

dreens
Messages
40
Reaction score
11
Hi there,

I recently attended a physics demonstration (Lightning show at Boston Museum of Science, my favorite exhibit obviously), where the educator argued that the reason she could safely sit in a Faraday Cage while lightning was striking said cage was the skin effect.

As I understand it, the skin effect describes the tendency of alternating currents to flow close to the surface of conducting wires, whereas the reason one is kept safe in a Faraday cage is more a static, DC effect where charges rearrange on the surface of a conductor so as to cancel the field within.

Of course, a cage being struck by lightning is certainly not a time independent phenomenon. It could be that static charge rearrangement and the skin effect both play a role- the former before the bolt while the field is building up, and the latter while the bolt is ramping up creating a large time-varying B-field.

In order to decide which effect is dominant, or whether both are important, I would like to know the frequency spectrum of the current waveform describing a lightning bolt. In other words, if you plotted current over time, you would find an initially small, corona based current caused by slow electron transfer to air near the surface of the faraday charge and the voltage source (van-de-graff generator in this case). Then, during the bolt, the current would be large. At some point, enough current has flowed that the voltage no longer sustains the plasma, and the current drops down to zero.

So the current waveform should look roughly like a square-wave. What I want to know is what frequency (or time constant) characterizes how sharp the rising and falling edges of the square wave are, how wide the square wave is, how square-like it is, etc.

As for width of the square wave, maybe someone knows how long a lightning bolt usually lasts? Maybe 100ms or so?

As for the rise time, maybe someone knows how quickly lightning travels? I think I've seen slow motion video of lightning bolts "moving" from ground to cloud, if I knew how quickly they move it should roughly answer the question of how quickly the current ramps up.

Thanks,
Dave
 
Science news on Phys.org
dreens said:
Hi there,

I recently attended a physics demonstration (Lightning show at Boston Museum of Science, my favorite exhibit obviously), where the educator argued that the reason she could safely sit in a Faraday Cage while lightning was striking said cage was the skin effect.

As I understand it, the skin effect describes the tendency of alternating currents to flow close to the surface of conducting wires, whereas the reason one is kept safe in a Faraday cage is more a static, DC effect where charges rearrange on the surface of a conductor so as to cancel the field within.

Of course, a cage being struck by lightning is certainly not a time independent phenomenon. It could be that static charge rearrangement and the skin effect both play a role- the former before the bolt while the field is building up, and the latter while the bolt is ramping up creating a large time-varying B-field.

In order to decide which effect is dominant, or whether both are important, I would like to know the frequency spectrum of the current waveform describing a lightning bolt. In other words, if you plotted current over time, you would find an initially small, corona based current caused by slow electron transfer to air near the surface of the faraday charge and the voltage source (van-de-graff generator in this case). Then, during the bolt, the current would be large. At some point, enough current has flowed that the voltage no longer sustains the plasma, and the current drops down to zero.

So the current waveform should look roughly like a square-wave. What I want to know is what frequency (or time constant) characterizes how sharp the rising and falling edges of the square wave are, how wide the square wave is, how square-like it is, etc.

As for width of the square wave, maybe someone knows how long a lightning bolt usually lasts? Maybe 100ms or so?

As for the rise time, maybe someone knows how quickly lightning travels? I think I've seen slow motion video of lightning bolts "moving" from ground to cloud, if I knew how quickly they move it should roughly answer the question of how quickly the current ramps up.

Thanks,
Dave
I believe the lightning has a fast rise time of 25 microseconds or so, corresponding to about 10 kHz, and then a slow decay over a fraction of a second. Sometimes there are multiple discharges over a second or two.
Regarding the speed of propagation, witnesses say things such as "the lighting hit the pole and then traveled down it, and then jumped to the tree". So one actually wonders if the discharge grows along the path fairly slowly - an ionisation process occurring - and the big current surge then follows, as you describe.
The skin effect seems important as the discharge has an AC component, so a minimum depth of conductor is needed. With very low frequencies, there is a problem obtaining magnetic shielding by using a conducting cage (similar to the problem of sending video over coaxial cable).
I experienced a small spark from my umbrella shaft to my hand when crossing London Bridge, caused by a strike to the next bridge about 500m away. I estimated the voltage and then calculated the "antenna current" in the lightning, and it came out to 10kA, which is quite plausible!
 
Hey, thanks tech. That's a really neat experience with the umbrella giving you a shock!

I guess with a 10kHz component the skin depth would be half a millimeter or so, and the Faraday cage at the museum had ~cm thick bars, definitely enough so that the skin effect is protective at that frequency.

In fact, now that I think about it the bolts in the museum seemed much less long lived than those in actual cloud to ground lightning, suggesting that the skin effect may be more important than the DC faraday cage effect in that situation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
754
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
14K