Fresh air (vacuum) as media for electromagnetics, can it have losses?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of electromagnetic plane waves traveling through vacuum and the possibility of these waves experiencing losses, specifically questioning whether conductivity can be non-zero in a vacuum.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the possibility of losses in vacuum, stating that conductivity (σ) should be zero due to the absence of free charges.
  • Another participant requests an exact reference for the claim of losses in vacuum, indicating a need for more specific information.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about the original claim, suggesting that it could be a misremembering or a subtle point that was overlooked.
  • One participant asserts that classically, free space is not a lossy medium, reinforcing the idea that vacuum should not exhibit losses.
  • Another participant introduces a semantic perspective, arguing that in a perfect vacuum, losses cannot occur, while raising questions about the origin of electromagnetic radiation in a vacuum.
  • A later reply emphasizes that the vacuum is stable in standard quantum field theory, suggesting that even in the presence of a single photon, the vacuum remains non-lossy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that classical vacuum is not lossy, but there are competing views regarding the definitions and implications of a vacuum, particularly in the context of quantum field theory.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential ambiguities in the definition of vacuum and its properties, as well as the lack of specific references to support claims about losses in vacuum.

Fernandopozasaura
Messages
13
Reaction score
3
Recently I saw an exercise on electromagnetics (plane waves) in which it was said that a plane wave was traveling through vacuum (ε0 and μ0) BUT with losses, i.e, σ ≠0.
Is that possible?
I think I have read in the past that it's OK in some texbook, but now, I have searched for it in a couple of physics texts without success.
As far as I've learned in my search, σ (conductivity) is due to free charges in volume where you want to get wave electric (or magnetic) field, so in vacuum (or fresh air, which is not exactly vacuum but that is another issue) as long as there is no material, no free charges will exist, so, σ = 0.
Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fernandopozasaura said:
Summary:: losses in vacuum for electromagnetic `plane waves. Is that possible?

Recently I saw an exercise
Can you please provide an exact reference?
 
Well, I saw it in an exame someone showed to me. I'm sorry I don't have more details.
 
There isn’t much we can do then. We can’t tell if you are misremembering the main point or if you forgot some important subtle point. Sorry.

Classically free space is not a lossy medium. That is about all that we can say generally without any specific details.
 
OK, I understand.
As you, my first answer was what you said: free space is not lossy. But somehow I remembered have read something different, that's why I asked. I hoped someone could eliminate other possibility.
Anyway, thank you very much for your help, Dale.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
I suspect that this has more to do with semantics; the definition of a vacuum. As a thought experiment, there just can't be any losses in a perfect vacuum everywhere the EM field is (i.e. everywhere). That does raise the question how did the EM radiation arise in a universe with nothing in it.
 
Well, obviously there is something in the universe. An we can't observe the vacuum, because to observe something we need to bring a measurement device in it, and then it's no longer a vacuum. A single photon in an otherwise empty universe is stable, i.e., the vacuum is not lossy at all in standard quantum field theory.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K