Friction: A box at rest on a slope

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a 22 kg box resting on a slope inclined at 45 degrees. Participants are tasked with determining the largest force that can be applied parallel to the ramp while keeping the box at rest, as well as the smallest perpendicular force needed for the same condition. The problem involves concepts of friction, normal force, and gravitational forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of forces acting on the box, including the net force down the slope and the role of friction. There is an exploration of how the normal force is affected by applied forces and how this relates to the frictional force. Some participants express uncertainty about the relevance of the kinetic coefficient of friction.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their calculations and questioning each other's reasoning. There is recognition of miscalculations regarding the normal force and its implications for the frictional force. Some participants are encouraged to clarify their calculations and reasoning further.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem requires careful consideration of forces acting both parallel and perpendicular to the slope. There is mention of a free body diagram as a useful tool for visualizing the forces involved. Some participants are also dealing with technical issues that may delay their contributions.

sonoftunk
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Mass of 22kg on a 45o to the horizontal.
[tex]\mu[/tex]s = 0.78
[tex]\mu[/tex]k = 0.65
Determine the magnitude of the largest force that can be applied upward parallel to the ramp to have the box remain at rest.
AND
Determine the magnitude of the smallest force applied to the top of the box, perpendicular to the ramp, to have the box remain at rest.

Homework Equations


All kinematic-based equations
Newton's Laws
FF = [tex]\mu[/tex]FN

The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed that the magnitude of the maximum force required would be equal to |FNET| + |FF| I got 2.0 x 102 Newtons of force (correct to two significant digits).

However, the second part, I'm not quite sure of what to do. I thought that if you are applying a force perpendicular to the ramp, you would be increasing the force of gravity perpendicular to the ramp, and since |FN| = |FgN| the normal force would increase. Then I thought the absolute value of the force of friction would have to equal the absolute value of the force of gravity acting parallel to the ramp. In that case, just solve to find the force needed.

I was told I was wrong.

(*side note* I didn't find a use for the kinetic coefficient of friction. I assume that it will be useful, but can't think of how)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sonoftunk said:

Homework Statement


Mass of 22kg on a 45o to the horizontal.
[tex]\mu[/tex]s = 0.78
[tex]\mu[/tex]k = 0.65
Determine the magnitude of the largest force that can be applied upward parallel to the ramp to have the box remain at rest.
AND
Determine the magnitude of the smallest force applied to the top of the box, perpendicular to the ramp, to have the box remain at rest.

Homework Equations


All kinematic-based equations
Newton's Laws
FF = [tex]\mu[/tex]FN

The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed that the magnitude of the maximum force required would be equal to |FNET| + |FF| I got 2.0 x 102 Newtons of force (correct to two significant digits).
Your equation neglects the component of the gravity force acting down the plane, and, in calculating F_f, you first need to calculate the normal force, which is not the same as the box weight.
However, the second part, I'm not quite sure of what to do. I thought that if you are applying a force perpendicular to the ramp, you would be increasing the force of gravity perpendicular to the ramp, and since |FN| = |FgN| the normal force would increase. Then I thought the absolute value of the force of friction would have to equal the absolute value of the force of gravity acting parallel to the ramp. In that case, just solve to find the force needed.

I was told I was wrong.
The applied force perpendicular to the box increases the normal force, not the gravity force. You need to draw a free body diagram and examine all forces perpendicular and parallel to the slope, then apply Newton's laws.
(*side note* I didn't find a use for the kinetic coefficient of friction. I assume that it will be useful, but can't think of how)
Neither can I. Don't let the question trick you. I have to go off line now, so please continue with your attempt, and I would think that one of the night shift owl helpers will assist.
 
Last edited:
I calculated my FNET drawing a FBD and looking at all forces. The only relevant ones were the force of gravity acting parallel to the plane and the force of friction, everything else canceled out. I had 34 Newtons down the plane for Net force.

You made me realize that I did calculate the Normal force wrong (forgot to include cos 45o), which did skew my answer. So force required would be 1.5 x 102 instead.)

Yeah, for the second part, I didn't think it was clear enough. Since I am increasing the normal force, would I not be correct in thinking that it would increase friction, and that I am trying to find an applied force that increases normal force enough so that the force of friction counteracts the net force? That is where I was told i was wrong.
 
sonoftunk said:
I calculated my FNET drawing a FBD and looking at all forces. The only relevant ones were the force of gravity acting parallel to the plane and the force of friction, everything else canceled out. I had 34 Newtons down the plane for Net force.
Well, in order for the box to remain at rest, the net force must be zero, which implies that you must apply a force of 34N up the plane to keep it at rest.
You made me realize that I did calculate the Normal force wrong (forgot to include cos 45o), which did skew my answer. So force required would be 1.5 x 102 instead.)
I'm missing you here. How did you get from 34N to 150N?
Yeah, for the second part, I didn't think it was clear enough. Since I am increasing the normal force, would I not be correct in thinking that it would increase friction, and that I am trying to find an applied force that increases normal force enough so that the force of friction counteracts the net force? That is where I was told i was wrong.
you may have been told you were wrong, because you are trying to find an applied force that increases normal force enough so that the force of friction counteracts the force of gravity down the plane, not the net force. The net force must be zero. Please show your work for this calculation, and i'll give it a look.
 
Okay, well my scanner is on the fritz at the moment, but as soon as I fix it, sure thing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
871
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K