Friction and Newton's second law

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving friction and Newton's second law, specifically analyzing the forces acting on a system of blocks. Participants explore the relationship between the forces, mass, and acceleration in the context of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of free-body diagrams and the application of Newton's second law to a system of blocks. Questions arise regarding the correct mass to use in calculations, with some participants suggesting that the total mass of the system should be considered rather than just one block's mass.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches to the problem, with participants sharing insights and clarifications about the forces involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of mass in the context of the entire system versus individual blocks.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the frame of reference and the implications of using an accelerating versus a stationary frame in their analyses. There is also mention of the need to consider tensions in the system, which adds complexity to the problem.

Joshuarr
Messages
23
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


It's attached.


Homework Equations



F = m*a
F_f = -μ_k*F_N // [Force of friction] = μ_k*[Normal force]

The Attempt at a Solution


So, I think I managed to solve it -- at least, I got what the book got, but I don't understand part of what I did to get the answer.

This is how I solved it and got the answer the book got:
I drew a free-body diagram, and realized that F_n = 2Mg
Which means F_f = -μ_k*2Mg, Block 2 is being pulled by an effective force to the right of Mg (Since -Mg + 2Mg = Mg).
So the summation of all the forces in the x direction would be:

***: Mg + F_f = Mg - μ_k*2Mg = (5*M)a

Plugging in for a and other known values and some algebra later, I get μ_k = 0.37

And that's the answer the book gives.

My question is why is it m = 5M in Newton's second law (the *** equation). When I first tried to solve it I used the mass of the 2nd block (m = 2M) and I thought that was correct.. apparently not.

Please explain this to me. Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • 2012-05-19 09-17-24.910.jpg
    2012-05-19 09-17-24.910.jpg
    36.4 KB · Views: 543
Physics news on Phys.org
think of it in a linear manner (see attached file). You will probably understand it now.
 

Attachments

  • remake.png
    remake.png
    5.1 KB · Views: 566
Joshuarr said:
***: Mg + F_f = Mg - μ_k*2Mg = (5*M)a

Plugging in for a and other known values and some algebra later, I get μ_k = 0.37

And that's the answer the book gives.

My question is why is it m = 5M in Newton's second law (the *** equation). When I first tried to solve it I used the mass of the 2nd block (m = 2M) and I thought that was correct.. apparently not.

The equation relates the total force on the system of the three blocks to their acceleration. If you take m=2M that would be considering only the force on the block of mass 2M, and its force equation would be different(involving tensions in string, etc). The 5M is for the system of all the three blocks taken together.
 
Thanks, that did help a lot. :)
 
Normally i calculate for each mass.

Check where the direction of acceleration
1.(3M)-
3Mg - F1=3Ma

2 (2M)
F1-F3-friction=2Ma

3. (M)
F3-Mg=Ma


(1)+(2) +(3)

3Mg-Mg-friction =6Ma
net force=ma(Newton 2nd Law)
 
Last edited:
lol, I was stuck on a problem involving tensions (I was using the total mass for m), and then I remember your saying something about that. Thanks! :)
 
Basically when you judge it from the accelerating frame of reference then there will be a pseudo force acting on each of the spheres which amounts to 5Ma.

From a non accelerating frame draw an FBD for each of the blocks separately and then solve the equations simultaneously. You will get what you were missing earlier.
 
I think your 3M is a mistake (it's 1M, 2M, 2M), but I understand what you're saying.

Oh. So it always ends up as a linear system of equations with n equations n unknowns (where n is the # of bodies), so I can use matrices! The other unknowns in this case would be the two tensions, what you called F1 and F2.

Thanks for helping me generalize the solution to the problem.
 
I'm not sure what you mean by an "accelerating frame of reference." The frame of reference would be the table (which is stationary), no?

I think by spheres you mean blocks, or perhaps that is some concept that I'm unfamiliar with..

Oh.. In this situation I would use the latter approach, right? Since there is a non-accelerating (stationary in fact) frame of reference.

You seem to imply that this problem has an accelerating frame of reference though, but maybe I'm misunderstanding you.
 
  • #10
Actually both the approaches are applicable and by accelerating FOR I mean the blocks itself ( sphere was a mistake).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
680
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
985