Friction causes a torque - then why do we sum it as a regular force?

AI Thread Summary
Friction generates torque, but torque is not a force and should not be included in a free body diagram (FBD) or summed with forces. Torque is balanced by other torques, not by forces like the normal force. When analyzing systems with both translational and rotational motion, forces are summed to find net force (Fnet=ma) while torques are summed to find net torque (τnet=Iα). It's important to recognize that the torque caused by forces depends on the chosen axis of rotation. Understanding the distinction between forces and torques is crucial in rigid body dynamics.
Differentiate it
Messages
63
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Friction causes a torque which is balanced out by the normal force. In most physics problems, we simply sum the applied force and friction, without considering anything about torque. I'm kind of new to Rigid Body Dynamics, so it'd be helpful if someone also explained how translational forces and torque are added in a system where there is both translational and rotational motion and/or sent links to some online resources. Thanks!
Relevant Equations
F=ma
Screenshot_20220829-112957.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Differentiate it said:
Homework Statement:: Friction causes a torque which is balanced out by the normal force. In most physics problems, we simply sum the applied force and friction, without considering anything about torque. I'm kind of new to Rigid Body Dynamics, so it'd be helpful if someone also explained how translational forces and torque are added in a system where there is both translational and rotational motion and/or sent links to some online resources. Thanks!
Relevant Equations:: F=ma

View attachment 313399
Torque is not a force so we do not include it on a FBD. We also don't sum it along with forces. (Check the units... the units for torque and force are different.)

I don't know what you mean by "Friction causes a torque which is balanced out by the normal force." A torque can only be balanced by another torque, not a force, and the torque due to the friction force is not canceled by the torque due to a normal force.

-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes Hall, Lnewqban and Differentiate it
topsquark said:
Torque is not a force so we do not include it on a FBD. We also don't sum it along with forces. (Check the units... the units for torque and force are different.)

I don't know what you mean by "Friction causes a torque which is balanced out by the normal force." A torque can only be balanced by another torque, not a force, and the torque due to the friction force is not canceled by the torque due to a normal force.

-Dan
Right right, I'm just stupid, no probs no probs i get it
 
Differentiate it said:
Friction causes a torque which is balanced out by the normal force.
The torque caused by a force is always in respect of some chosen axis. In the diagram, using an axis at ground level, F applies a torque, Ff doesn’t.
The exception is when you have a pair of equal and opposite forces along parallel lines of application. In that case the net torque is the same no matter what axis you choose.
What you can say is that if the system is static then the torque due to the F, Ff pair balances the torque due to the N, mg pair.
Differentiate it said:
how translational forces and torque are added in a system
You add the forces to write Fnet=ma, and add the torques to write τnet=Iα.
topsquark said:
Torque is not a force so we do not include it on a FBD.
It's quite standard to include torques in an FBD where appropriate. In some posed questions, applied torques are specified as such, rather than as pairs of equal and opposite forces.
 
Differentiate it said:
Right right, I'm just stupid, no probs no probs i get it
If you were stupid you wouldn't have asked us to help you clarify your question!

-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes gmax137, hmmm27, Lnewqban and 3 others
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top