Friction force, Coefficient of friction &Traction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the complexities of friction force, specifically the coefficient of friction and its implications for traction in vehicles. Participants clarify that while the coefficient of friction is generally independent of the contact area, practical scenarios, such as tire tread wear, significantly affect traction and braking distance. It is established that smooth tires can outperform treaded tires on clean, dry surfaces, but tread patterns are essential for wet or soft conditions. The conversation also emphasizes that friction coefficients must be measured experimentally, as theoretical calculations are not feasible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of friction force and its principles
  • Knowledge of tire dynamics and surface interactions
  • Familiarity with experimental measurement techniques
  • Basic physics concepts related to force and motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of tire tread patterns on traction in various conditions
  • Study the experimental methods for measuring friction coefficients
  • Explore the relationship between surface smoothness and friction
  • Investigate the effects of inertial forces on friction in high-performance tires
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for automotive engineers, tire manufacturers, physicists studying friction, and anyone involved in vehicle performance optimization.

EEristavi
Messages
108
Reaction score
5
I have few (more or less) general questions:

1. I know that: "The coefficients of friction are nearly independent of the area of contact
between the surfaces".
I understand this, but I know from everyday life, when car tire tread is worn off, braking distance increases and maximum acceleration & traction decreases (it's just my observation and assumption) which is caused by friction force. My explanation for this problem is following: I know tire has grooves/patterns, so not whole tire area is touched to the ground and when it's worn off grooves disappear, contact area increases and friction decreases.
Is nearly independent causing such a big change in everyday life, or am I far away from real answer?

2. As I understand friction coefficient depends on 2 surfaces (for ex. asphalt/rubber friction coef. is m1 and ice/rubber is m2).
Firstly, is there any parameter that characterizes smoothness/friction (or something like that, I think you'll understand what I mean) of single surface?
Secondly, if I know asphalt/rubber (m1) and ice/rubber (m2) friction coefficient, can I calculate asphalt/ice friction coefficient (and how)?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
As to your comment about tread vs. smooth tires, your assumptions/observations are incorrect. Smooth tires are superior in traction as long as there is a clean dry surface, as evidenced by both track and drag racing usage. Tire treads are required for wet and soft surfaces. In theory, friction is not dependent upon area; however, in vehicle tires a larger contact patch will give more consistent grip because road surfaces are not perfectly smooth or clean and therefore do not have a consistent friction factor over the tire patch area. Larger patch area helps bridge the contaminated/irregular road spots and provides a larger area for imprinting of the irregular road surface into the elastic tire surface.
 
Good example and explanation, thank you.
As I understand you can't provide information about second topic.
 
EEristavi said:
Firstly, is there any parameter that characterizes smoothness/friction (or something like that, I think you'll understand what I mean) of single surface?
No.
EEristavi said:
Secondly, if I know asphalt/rubber (m1) and ice/rubber (m2) friction coefficient, can I calculate asphalt/ice friction coefficient (and how)?
No.

Friction can be a very complex subject. To my knowledge, there is no theoretical way for finding the friction coefficient. We have to measure it experimentally with the given conditions.

A tire is a good example of that. Especially a drag tire. This type of tire is so «sticky» that it could be consider borderline glue at some point. (Which raise another question: What is the friction coefficient of duct tape?) Furthermore, when the tire is rotating under very high acceleration, the inertial effect of the tire «hitting» the ground increases the effective normal force and so the apparent friction coefficient is increased.

Imagine a rack and pinion gear arrangement with a fixed rack. What determines the force that this gear can take? Well, if the teeth are strong enough, it can be infinite. If the teeth break at a certain threshold, we can define the force easily. If the teeth breaks with a certain defined range, then some sort of average value can be estimated. If the range for the pinion teeth is different from the range of the rack teeth, the average can be more difficult to determine, especially if the ranges have common values. Now imagine some teeth are randomly missing in addition of everything else. Then imagine that the force range for breaking the rack teeth is dependent on the type of gear that is rolling on it, and vice versa. Now you begin to see the complexity of evaluating a friction coefficient between 2 surfaces.

Very complex subject.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
Very nice example, makes me see whole new picture.
Can I imagine that teeth don't break, instead pinion jumps from rack's teeth?
 
EEristavi said:
Can I imagine that teeth don't break, instead pinion jumps from rack's teeth?
I'm not sure what you mean, but friction is mostly that: Bonds that break.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K