- #1
mateomy
- 307
- 0
(Working out of Boas chapter 12, section 11)
[tex]
3xy'' + (3x + 1)y' + y = 0
[/tex]
I'm asked to solve the differential equation using the method of Frobenius but I'm finding the way Boas introduces/explains/exemplifies the method to be incredibly confusing. So, I used some google-fu and was even more confused. Seems like everyone has a different plan of attack for these problems.
What I've done so far is to assume
[tex]
y = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n x^{n+s}
[/tex]
*I know in a normal expansion it's simpy [itex]x^n[/itex] but from my understanding we're to multiply the summation by another factor of [itex]x^s[/itex], or whatever variable we choose.
...doing like wise for the respective derivatives:
[tex]
y' = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n (n+s) x^{n+s-1}
[/tex]
[tex]
y'' = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n (n+s-1) (n+s) x^{n+s-2}
[/tex]
then we substitute these expansions into the respective places within the original equation.
Now this is where I'm getting REALLY REALLY confused. Boas says to make a table and then from there find the indicial equation. From various pdf's and youtube videos I'm getting different information. Can anyone please point me onto the right path?
Thanks.
[tex]
3xy'' + (3x + 1)y' + y = 0
[/tex]
I'm asked to solve the differential equation using the method of Frobenius but I'm finding the way Boas introduces/explains/exemplifies the method to be incredibly confusing. So, I used some google-fu and was even more confused. Seems like everyone has a different plan of attack for these problems.
What I've done so far is to assume
[tex]
y = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n x^{n+s}
[/tex]
*I know in a normal expansion it's simpy [itex]x^n[/itex] but from my understanding we're to multiply the summation by another factor of [itex]x^s[/itex], or whatever variable we choose.
...doing like wise for the respective derivatives:
[tex]
y' = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n (n+s) x^{n+s-1}
[/tex]
[tex]
y'' = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n (n+s-1) (n+s) x^{n+s-2}
[/tex]
then we substitute these expansions into the respective places within the original equation.
Now this is where I'm getting REALLY REALLY confused. Boas says to make a table and then from there find the indicial equation. From various pdf's and youtube videos I'm getting different information. Can anyone please point me onto the right path?
Thanks.