FRW Model Q: Why Does Positive (ρ+3p) Prove Big Bang?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Auburnman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Model
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) model and its implications for the Big Bang singularity. It establishes that if the combination of energy density (ρ) and pressure (p) satisfies the condition (ρ + 3p) > 0, it leads to a negative acceleration of the scale factor (a) in the past, ultimately resulting in a = 0 at a finite time, indicating a Big Bang singularity. The second Friedmann equation, in units where G = c = 1, is crucial for this analysis. However, the argument is limited to the idealized FRW model, necessitating additional support from the Hawking singularity theorem and observational data for a comprehensive proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Friedmann equations in cosmology
  • Familiarity with the FRW metric and its implications
  • Knowledge of energy density (ρ) and pressure (p) in cosmological contexts
  • Basic grasp of the Hawking singularity theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the second Friedmann equation in cosmology
  • Explore the Hawking singularity theorem and its relevance to cosmological models
  • Investigate observational constraints that support the existence of a Big Bang singularity
  • Examine the limitations of the FRW model in describing the real universe
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics students interested in the dynamics of the universe and the theoretical foundations of the Big Bang model.

Auburnman
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
So I've been reading a bunch about the FRW metric and doing FRW dynamics. I had a quick theory question involving the FRW Model in general. So in the Friedmann equations why is it that if the combination of (ρ + 3p) is always positive then it somehow proves the existence of a big bang like singularity in the past?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume you're referring to the second Friedmann equation, which (in units where G = c = 1, and with zero cosmological constant) looks like this:

[tex]\frac{1}{a} \frac{d^2 a}{dt^2} = - \frac{4 \pi}{3} \left( \rho + 3 p \right)[/tex]

Suppose that at some time [itex]t_0[/itex], which we could call "now" :wink:, we have that [itex]a > 0[/itex] and [itex]da /dt > 0[/itex]. This says that the Universe has some nonzero "size" (the scale factor a is a measure of "how large" the Universe is, though there are some technicalities with that that we probably don't need to get into here), and that it is expanding--i.e., to the future of [itex]t_0[/itex], a(t) will increase.

Now follow the history of the Universe into the past, given those conditions at [itex]t_0[/itex]. In the past direction, the Universe is contracting; and if [itex]\rho + 3 p[/itex] is positive, then [itex]d^2 a / dt^2[/itex] is negative, meaning that as we go into the past, the contraction of the universe "accelerates". That is enough to ensure that at some finite time in the past, we will reach a = 0, which is the Big Bang singularity.
 
Although this is fine as far as it goes, you have to be careful not to oversell it, because it's only an argument that applies to the perfectly symmetric FRW model you're working with. The real universe lacks that perfect symmetry, so you really need the Hawking singularity theorem plus some observational constraints to prove that there was a singularity in the past.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K