Automotive Fuel Efficiency: Car #1 vs Car #2 | Ask an Expert

  • Thread starter Thread starter PookAir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Efficiency Fuel
Click For Summary
In a comparison of two identical cars at 2000 RPM, one in 4th gear and the other in 3rd, the car in 4th gear will likely consume more fuel per minute due to higher speed and power requirements, despite a potentially lower brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC). The difference in fuel consumption is influenced by factors such as engine load, gear ratios, and aerodynamic drag, with the 4th gear car needing to overcome greater air resistance. Uphill driving would further increase fuel consumption differences, while downhill driving could reduce them. Ultimately, both cars will use nearly the same amount of fuel at 2000 RPM, but the 4th gear vehicle will generally consume slightly more. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for optimizing fuel efficiency in different driving conditions.
  • #31
Define what you mean when you say lean. Unless we are discussing from a common reference point using the same definitons everything is pointless.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
If an engine is running 'lean' there is a more abundant amount of oxygen present under combustion than is necessary for a stoichiometric burn, being as compression ignition engines (generally) have a higher presence of oxygen than is needed for a stoichiometric burn (see my results earlier) then it is running lean. I think that's a fair definition. If the engine s A/F ratio increases from 25:1 to 35:1 as load increases then that is simply more lean. I'm unsure how to break down terminology further.

You initially stated "I'll not discuss anything diesel with someone who thinks they can run "lean"", so i presume you believe that's impossible, in which case, why? Secondly, the journal you posted also used the term 'lean' in regards to compression ignition engines several times - I quoted some pieces for you, so surely that confirms that is the correct terminology?
 
  • #33
The Chase said:
If an engine is running 'lean' there is a more abundant amount of oxygen present under combustion than is necessary for a stoichiometric burn

I'd agree with that though I'd make it more clear by saying.
Lean is an equivilance ratio less than 1.

I'd also further define it as over the full stroke.
 
  • #34
I would agree with those corrections for sure.
 
  • #35
The Chase said:
I can plot NO or NOx (or both) against a BMEP value that isn't constant and provide the A/F ratio of each point?.

That would be great, thanks. Total NOx would be fine. If you could also outline the key operating conditions for each curve that would help (inlet manifold temperature, jacket water temp, engine speed, start of injection etc).

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
20K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
23K