Fuel Efficiency: Car #1 vs Car #2 | Ask an Expert

  • Context: Automotive 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PookAir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Efficiency Fuel
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on fuel efficiency comparisons between two identical cars operating at 2000 RPM, one in 4th gear and the other in 3rd gear. It is established that the car in 4th gear will consume more fuel per minute due to higher power requirements to overcome aerodynamic drag, despite potentially lower brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) at that RPM. The calculations indicate that the fuel consumption rate in 4th gear can be approximately 1.70 times greater than in 3rd gear, especially when considering the effects of load and terrain, such as uphill or downhill driving.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of engine RPM and gear ratios
  • Knowledge of brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC)
  • Familiarity with aerodynamic drag and its impact on fuel efficiency
  • Basic principles of vehicle dynamics and load management
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of gear ratios on fuel economy in various driving conditions
  • Learn about brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) and its relevance to engine efficiency
  • Investigate the effects of aerodynamic drag on fuel consumption at different speeds
  • Explore vehicle load management techniques to optimize fuel efficiency
USEFUL FOR

Automotive engineers, fuel efficiency analysts, and car enthusiasts interested in optimizing vehicle performance and understanding the dynamics of fuel consumption in relation to gear selection.

  • #31
Define what you mean when you say lean. Unless we are discussing from a common reference point using the same definitons everything is pointless.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
If an engine is running 'lean' there is a more abundant amount of oxygen present under combustion than is necessary for a stoichiometric burn, being as compression ignition engines (generally) have a higher presence of oxygen than is needed for a stoichiometric burn (see my results earlier) then it is running lean. I think that's a fair definition. If the engine s A/F ratio increases from 25:1 to 35:1 as load increases then that is simply more lean. I'm unsure how to break down terminology further.

You initially stated "I'll not discuss anything diesel with someone who thinks they can run "lean"", so i presume you believe that's impossible, in which case, why? Secondly, the journal you posted also used the term 'lean' in regards to compression ignition engines several times - I quoted some pieces for you, so surely that confirms that is the correct terminology?
 
  • #33
The Chase said:
If an engine is running 'lean' there is a more abundant amount of oxygen present under combustion than is necessary for a stoichiometric burn

I'd agree with that though I'd make it more clear by saying.
Lean is an equivilance ratio less than 1.

I'd also further define it as over the full stroke.
 
  • #34
I would agree with those corrections for sure.
 
  • #35
The Chase said:
I can plot NO or NOx (or both) against a BMEP value that isn't constant and provide the A/F ratio of each point?.

That would be great, thanks. Total NOx would be fine. If you could also outline the key operating conditions for each curve that would help (inlet manifold temperature, jacket water temp, engine speed, start of injection etc).

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
20K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
21K