Full range speaker not able to deliver all frequencies with perfection.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the limitations of full range speakers in delivering all frequencies with perfection compared to a multi-driver arrangement that includes tweeters, midranges, woofers, and subwoofers. It explores the physical and material constraints affecting sound reproduction across different frequency ranges.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the inability of full range speakers to reproduce all frequencies perfectly is due to the mass of the diaphragm, which affects high-frequency reproduction.
  • Others argue that for woofers to produce low frequencies, the diaphragm must move large distances, which is challenging for a thin diaphragm.
  • A participant raises a material issue, questioning why a heavy cone struggles with high frequencies due to its inability to move quickly.
  • One participant introduces a mathematical model involving a circular piston and monopole radiation, discussing how sound pressure can be modeled and the implications of diaphragm size and velocity on frequency reproduction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the reasons behind the limitations of full range speakers, with no consensus reached on the primary factors affecting frequency reproduction.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes complex physical principles and mathematical modeling, which may depend on specific assumptions about speaker design and material properties that are not fully explored.

dE_logics
Messages
742
Reaction score
0
Why is it that a full range speaker is not able to deliver all frequencies at once with perfection as compared to the standard tweeder, midrange, woofer and optionally subwoofer arrangement?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
In order to accurately reproduce high frequencies, the tweeter has a very light diaphram. There too much mass in an all-in-one speaker diaphram to reproduce high frequencies.
 
Also the exact opposite. For a woofer to produce low wavelengths especially at high volumes, the diaphragm needs to move very large distances. That would prove a very difficult thing for a very thin diaphragm and to not tear or fatigue.
 
So it's more of a material issue.

But why is it that a heavy cone will have difficulty to produce high frequencies?...it can't move that fast?
 
Ok...I get it...
 
I'll go into a little overkill. Let's consider a circular piston of radius z, mounted in an infinite rigid baffle. The noise radiated by this oscillating piston can be modeled in terms of numerous monopoles radiating together. Each monopole is radiating from a rigid, fully-reflecting plane, not from free space. Therefore, the sound pressure due to anyone of the baffled monopole is twice that of an equivalent monopole in free space[30].
[tex] p'(r,t) = \frac{ik\rho_0c}{2\pi r}Q_p e^{i(\omega t - kr)}[/tex]
In this equation, Q represents the source strength of the monopole on the surface and is equal to [tex]U_p \delta S[/tex] where U is the peak surface velocity of the monopole and [tex]\delta S[/tex] is an elemental surface area. We can then integrate over the whole surface to get the resultant pressure fluctuation due to all the monopoles vibrating in phase.
[tex] p'(r,\theta,t) = \frac{ik\rho_0 c \pi z^2 U_p e^{i(\omega t - kr)}}{2\pi r}\left[\frac{2J_1(kz\sin\theta)}{kz\sin\theta}\right][/tex]
So, basically I'm just putting equations to words. The Bessel term on the right is a directivity term and puts in those nasty "lobes" that make certain seats at the opera house the "ideal" place to sit.

So, lower frequencies give us lower reduced frequencies, k. This gives us two variables to play with, U (the maximum velocity) and z (the piston, {e.g. speaker} diamter). In order to make the low frequency noise at a level that is equal to high frequency, one of these needs to go up. Increasing the velocity of the speaker can potentially cause damage, while increasing the piston diameter seems simple. In addition to this, because its exponential, we can get a greater effect simply by increasing the size.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
16K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
47
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K