High School Math Jokes: 1-1=0, but 2=0? Impossible!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Harsha Avinash Tanti
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impossible Jokes
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a nonsensical math joke that incorrectly concludes 2 equals 0 by misapplying algebraic principles. Participants critique the joke for promoting misunderstandings in mathematics, emphasizing that it uses a false logical statement. One user expresses discomfort with the joke's potential to mislead learners, advocating for humor that fosters better mathematical understanding. Another user shares a magic trick involving numbers to illustrate a different kind of math-related amusement. Ultimately, the thread is closed to prevent further propagation of the flawed joke.
Harsha Avinash Tanti
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I would like share a nonsense math problem which certainly wrong but its fun I would like others to join as well in my endeavor to create jokes by using math. the joke is as follows

As we know,
1-1=0
let,
a = 1 , b = 1
then,
a - b = 0
also,
a^2 - b^2 = 0 as a^2 = 1 and b^2 = 1
thus as per algebra
(a - b)(a + b) = 0
thus,
i.e, a - b = 0 and a + b = 0
i.e, 1 - 1 = 0 and 2 = 0.
:woot::nb):smile::sorry:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Harsha Avinash Tanti said:
I would like share a nonsense math problem which certainly wrong but its fun I would like others to join as well in my endeavor to create jokes by using math. the joke is as follows

As we know,
1-1=0
let,
a = 1 , b = 1
then,
a - b = 0
also,
a^2 - b^2 = 0 as a^2 = 1 and b^2 = 1
thus as per algebra
(a - b)(a + b) = 0
thus,
i.e, a - b = 0 and a + b = 0
i.e, 1 - 1 = 0 and 2 = 0.
:woot::nb):smile::sorry:
This isn't really new: hide zero in a variable and divide by it. What's new is, that you have hidden the division in a multiplication as you used a false logical statement: AND instead of OR. And even OR isn't necessarily true.

I'm not very comfortable with this kind of "joke" because it is simply just wrong on so many levels, that these examples guide the wrong way to seriously learn mathematics. There are better "jokes" where you can actually learn something instead of to learn how to make mistakes. I've seen the above on so many occasions in students' homework or tests, that it is not funny at all. We try to improve mathematical skills, not to damage them.
 
Harsha Avinash Tanti said:
(a - b)(a + b) = 0
thus,
i.e, a - b = 0 and a + b = 0
i.e, 1 - 1 = 0 and 2 = 0.
:woot::nb)[emoji2]:sorry:

Doesn't really work as a joke because, as already pointed out you made a mistake, it's OR not AND.
 
fresh_42 said:
This isn't really new: hide zero in a variable and divide by it. What's new is, that you have hidden the division in a multiplication as you used a false logical statement: AND instead of OR. And even OR isn't necessarily true.

I'm not very comfortable with this kind of "joke" because it is simply just wrong on so many levels, that these examples guide the wrong way to seriously learn mathematics. There are better "jokes" where you can actually learn something instead of to learn how to make mistakes. I've seen the above on so many occasions in students' homework or tests, that it is not funny at all. We try to improve mathematical skills, not to damage them.

I get that but just did that for pun man I am not at all serious about it.

CWatters said:
Doesn't really work as a joke because, as already pointed out you made a mistake, it's OR not AND.
How about this one,
I use this as magic trick to amuse my nephew

I think of any number between 20000 and 30000
say 29547 then I put in an envelop
then
I give a number 9549
then I ask for a random number from my nephew suppose he says 2347
then I say a random number 7652
then I ask for another random number and he says 4587
then I say a random number 5412

then I tell him to add it all up vol-ah you get 29547.

What trick have I used and can you do it for number range 50000 to 60000
 
I think we've run the course of math jokes here. Closing the thread now so as to prevent future readers from making these same mistakes in math.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
15K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K