MHB Functions Continuous on Comapct Sets .... Apostol, Theorem 4.25 ....

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the proof of Theorem 4.25 from Apostol's "Mathematical Analysis," specifically regarding the statement that the sets f^{-1}(A) form an open covering of X. Participants clarify that since f is continuous, each set f^{-1}(A) is open, and for any x in X, f(x) belongs to the union of sets A in F, ensuring that x is included in at least one f^{-1}(A). This leads to the conclusion that the sets f^{-1}(A) indeed cover X. The conversation emphasizes the need for a formal and rigorous proof, which is ultimately provided and appreciated by the original poster.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Tom M Apostol's book "Mathematical Analysis" (Second Edition) ...

I am focused on Chapter 4: Limits and Continuity ... ...

I need help in order to fully understand the proof of Theorem 4.25 ... ... Theorem 4.25 (including its proof) reads as follows:
View attachment 9231
View attachment 9232

In the above proof by Apostol we read the following:

" ... ... The sets $$f^{ -1 } (A)$$ form an open covering of $$X$$ ... ... "Could someone please demonstrate an explicit formal and rigorous proof of this statement ...?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My thoughts:

Since $$f$$ is continuous we have that each set $$f^{ -1 } (A)$$ is open

and ...

... for $$X \subseteq S$$ we have

$$X \subseteq f^{ -1 } ( f(x) )$$ ... ... (see Apostol Exercise 2.7 (a) Chapter 2, page 44 ...)

... and we also have $$f(X) \subseteq A_c$$ where $$A_c = \bigcup_{ A \in F } A$$ ...

Therefore $$X \subseteq f^{ -1 } ( f(x) ) \subseteq f^{ -1 } ( A_c )$$ ...Is that correct? ... Does that constitute a formal and rigorous proof?

Hope someone can help ...

Peter

================================================================================The above post refers to Apostol Exercise 2.7 so I am providing access to the same as follows:
View attachment 9233
Hope that helps ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • Apostol - 1- Theorem 4.25 ... PART 1 ...  .png
    Apostol - 1- Theorem 4.25 ... PART 1 ... .png
    11 KB · Views: 132
  • Apostol - 2 - Theorem 4.25 ... PART 2 ...  .png
    Apostol - 2 - Theorem 4.25 ... PART 2 ... .png
    14.9 KB · Views: 149
  • Apostol -  Exercises 2.6 and 2.7 ... .png
    Apostol - Exercises 2.6 and 2.7 ... .png
    15.1 KB · Views: 129
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
In the above proof by Apostol we read the following:

" ... ... The sets $$f^{ -1 } (A)$$ form an open covering of $$X$$ ... ... "Could someone please demonstrate an explicit formal and rigorous proof of this statement ...?
I would put it like this:

If $x\in X$ then $f(x) \in f(X) \subseteq \bigcup_{A\in F}A$. Therefore $f(x)$ is in (at least) one of the sets $A \in F$, say $f(x)\in A_x$. Then $x \in f^{-1}(A_x)$. Since that holds for every $x$ in $X$, it follows that the sets $$f^{ -1 } (A)$$ form a covering of $$X$$.
 
Opalg said:
I would put it like this:

If $x\in X$ then $f(x) \in f(X) \subseteq \bigcup_{A\in F}A$. Therefore $f(x)$ is in (at least) one of the sets $A \in F$, say $f(x)\in A_x$. Then $x \in f^{-1}(A_x)$. Since that holds for every $x$ in $X$, it follows that the sets $$f^{ -1 } (A)$$ form a covering of $$X$$.
Thanks for a very convincing proof Opalg ...

Appreciate your help ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K