The invariant of SL(2,C) is proven to be invariant under the action of the group by the following(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[itex]\epsilon'_{\alpha\beta} = N_{\alpha}^{\rho}N_{\beta}^{\sigma}\epsilon_{\rho\sigma}=\epsilon_{\alpha\beta}detN=\epsilon_{\alpha\beta}[/itex]

The existence of an invariant of this form (with two indices down) tells us that the covariant (here fundamental of SL(2,C)) and contra variant reps aren't independent. This seems to me to follow directly from the fact that detN=1. Is this true? And can anyone bring forward an example where covariant and contra variant reps are truly independent?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Fundamental and contravariant representations

Loading...

Similar Threads for Fundamental contravariant representations |
---|

I ##A_\mu^a=0## in global gauge symmetries ? |

I Excited hadrons v. fundamental particles |

B What is source of fundamental particle charge? |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**