Fundamental Counting Principle Proof (NOT via induction)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the Fundamental Counting Principle, which states that if set A has m elements and set B has n elements, then the Cartesian product A × B contains mn elements. The user seeks clarification on the proof method suggested by Paul Sally in his book "Tools of the Trade," specifically the technique of "drawing little trees" to illustrate this principle without using induction. The user also explores the concept of bijective correspondence to define sets A and B, indicating a foundational understanding of set theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory and bijections
  • Familiarity with Cartesian products of sets
  • Basic knowledge of combinatorial principles
  • Experience with mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of Cartesian products in set theory
  • Learn about bijective functions and their properties
  • Explore combinatorial proofs and techniques
  • Study visual proof methods, including tree diagrams
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students of mathematics, educators teaching combinatorics, and anyone interested in understanding foundational principles of counting in set theory.

Chicago_Boy1
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I am going through some sample problems exercises in Paul Sally's Tools of the Trade, and am being asked to prove the Fundamental Counting Principle. That is, If A has m elements and B has n elements, then A X B has mn elements.

Sally goes on to write that "this is simple to prove by drawing little trees or using some other artifice."

Basically, I am not really sure what he means by "drawing little trees." Can someone guide me through how I can actually prove this WITHOUT induction?

Thank you in advance.

P.S. I know that I am supposed to show that I've attempted to solve the problem, but honestly I have no idea where to even start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your definition of "A has m elements" for a set A? It's probably something like "A is in bijective correspondence with the set [m] = \{0, 1, \dots, m - 1\}" (although knowing Sally, he probably starts counting with 1 instead). So you can rephrase the problem as: If f: A \to [m] is a bijection and g: B \to [n] is a bijection, find a bijection h: A \times B \to [mn]. Does that help?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K