Fundamental groups and arcwise connected spaces.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter center o bass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fundamental Groups
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 4K views
center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2
If a space X is arcwise connected, then for any two points p and q in X the fundamental groups ##\pi_1(X,p)## and ##\pi_1(X,q)## are isomorphic. This means that we can, up to isomorphisms, identify both groups with their equivalence class ##\pi_1(X)##.

I started to think about the generality of this theorem. Is there any interesting/important spaces which are not arcwise connected except for the union of two disjoint spaces etc?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
center o bass said:
If a space X is arcwise connected, then for any two points p and q in X the fundamental groups ##\pi_1(X,p)## and ##\pi_1(X,q)## are isomorphic. This means that we can, up to isomorphisms, identify both groups with their equivalence class ##\pi_1(X)##.

I started to think about the generality of this theorem. Is there any interesting/important spaces which are not arcwise connected except for the union of two disjoint spaces etc?
Any Hausdorff space that is not path-connected is also not arc-connected. Therefore, the so-called "Topologist's Sine Curve," a relatively important topological space, is not arc-connected.
 
Mandelbroth said:
Any Hausdorff space that is not path-connected is also not arc-connected. Therefore, the so-called "Topologist's Sine Curve," a relatively important topological space, is not arc-connected.

It's not a relatively important topological space, since it serves more as a counterexample than as something worth studying on its own. Sure, it's a nice and important counterexample, but that's it. It's not a topological space central to algebraic topology like topological manifolds.
 
micromass said:
It's not a relatively important topological space, since it serves more as a counterexample than as something worth studying on its own. Sure, it's a nice and important counterexample, but that's it. It's not a topological space central to algebraic topology like topological manifolds.
Meh. It was the first Hausdorff space that isn't path-connected that came to mind. :rolleyes:

I have to agree with micro, though. It isn't important itself. Come to think of it, off the top of my head, I can't think of any particularly "important" spaces that are not arc-connected.

As a side note, topological manifolds are locally arc-connected (since they are Hausdorff and locally path-connected).