Unit sphere arcwise connected?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chy1013m1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sphere Unit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves demonstrating that the unit sphere defined by the equation {(x, y, z) : x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1} in R^3 is arcwise connected.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss finding a continuous map to connect two points on the sphere and question the validity of a linear interpolation approach. There is a consideration of the convexity of the sphere and whether a straight line between two points on the sphere remains on the sphere. Some suggest projecting paths onto the sphere to maintain arcwise connection.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods to define a continuous path on the sphere. Some guidance has been offered regarding projections and the definition of arc-connectedness, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions of arc-connectedness and the implications of the sphere's geometry, particularly regarding paths that may or may not intersect the interior of the sphere.

chy1013m1
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the unit sphere {(x, y, z) : x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1} in R^3 is arcwise connected.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


find a continuous map f(t ) such that f( 0) = a, f(1 ) = b. a, b, in R^3 and are on the unit sphere. then show for every t in [0,1] f(t ) is on the sphere. just having trouble finding the right f . Tried f = ta + (1-t)b but only noticed that it is a line segment , so it should be wrong..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a sphere is convex? I know balls are convex.. just by intuition, a line from a -> b (a, b, on the sphere, the 'shell') is not on the shell of the sphere. .? since {(x, y, z) : x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1} , equality is required not <= (i may be wrong)
 
Just pick any path between the points that doesn't go through zero (eg, the straight line path unless they are diamterically opposed) and project it on the sphere by dividing each vector r(t) by its length. There is a slight technical difference between paths and arcs: arcs can't intersect themselves. But it shouldn't be hard to show this isn't a problem for the projections here.
 
would all the points on the vector ab (a,b on the sphere) be on the sphere?.. i cannot see that and I don't think so..
I am just following the def of arc-connectness:
A set S in Rn is arc-connected if any 2 points in S can be joined by a continuous curve in S, that is, if for any a, b, in S, there is a continuous map f : [0,1] ->Rn s.t. f( 0) = a, f( 1) = b and f(t ) is in S for all t in [0, 1]
 
No, they're not on the sphere. But StatusX told you how to get round that.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K