# Further S matrix clarifications

• I
• Silviu
In summary: He says "The creation/annihilation operators, don't they evolve with the full interaction hamiltonian?"
Silviu
Hello! I attached a SS of the part of my book that I am confused about. So there they write the initial and final states in term of creation and annihilation operators, acting on the (not free) vacuum i.e. ##|\Omega>##. So first thing, the value of the creation (annihilation) operators at ##\pm\infty## are not the same, right? They evolve in time with the full interaction hamiltonian, so differently from the free case they have different values in time. Second thing, the last line, if I understand it well, and plugging in the values for the initial and final states, would be $$<f|S|i>=<f|i>$$ Is this right? It looks like the S matrix does nothing here. What am I doing wrong? Thank you!

#### Attachments

• qft.png
27.9 KB · Views: 401
A few sentences down Schwartz says the creation/annihilation operators are rotated by the interacting hamiltonian and so are different at different times t and t'.

The use of the ##S## in ##<f|i>## here is a bit confusing, compare to Srednicki.

bolbteppa said:
A few sentences down Schwartz says the creation/annihilation operators are rotated by the interacting hamiltonian and so are different at different times t and t'.

The use of the ##S## in ##<f|i>## here is a bit confusing, compare to Srednicki.
Thank you for this! I am sorry I honestly didn't have time to go further yet. However, the creation/annihilation operators, don't they evolve with the full interaction hamiltonian? Shouldn't we have some terms of the form ##e^{iHt}## in between them, to evolve them between the 2 times? Why do we use the S-matrix and not the usual time evolution operator? Edit: I read the notes from the link you mentioned. He doesn't even mention the S matrix there... Also even if he uses the interaction theory he uses for the vacuum ##|0>## and not ##|\Omega>##. Is his ##|0>## the ground state of the interaction theory? And what happens to the S matrix?

Last edited:
Schwartz mentioned the dependence of the ##a(t)##'s on ##e^{iHt}## on the same page and goes over the whole derivation in the next few chapters, e.g. I think he brings up ##|\Omega >## more in the next chapter, though I do not see where he explained why ##S## does not appear, he should have mentioned something like ##S|in > = |out>##, ##<out|in > = <in|S|in>## somewhere, something analogous to slide 18 here.

Look at page 56 in Schwartz.

## 1. What is an S matrix?

The S matrix, also known as the scattering matrix, is a representation of how particles interact and change as they scatter off of each other. It is commonly used in quantum mechanics and high energy physics.

## 2. What does "further" in "Further S matrix clarifications" refer to?

"Further" in this context refers to additional or more detailed explanations or clarifications about the S matrix. It implies that there have been previous clarifications made that may not have been sufficient.

## 3. How is the S matrix calculated?

The S matrix is calculated using mathematical equations and models based on the laws of quantum mechanics. It takes into account the properties of the particles involved, such as their mass, energy, and spin.

## 4. Why are S matrix clarifications important?

S matrix clarifications are important because they help us better understand the behavior of particles and their interactions. This knowledge is crucial for developing theories and models in physics and for making accurate predictions about the outcomes of experiments.

## 5. Are there different types of S matrix clarifications?

Yes, there are different types of S matrix clarifications depending on the specific aspect of the S matrix being discussed. Some common types include clarifications on the mathematical calculations, the physical interpretation of the results, and the application of the S matrix in different contexts.

• High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
• Quantum Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
• Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
990
• Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
687
• High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
• High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
9
Views
2K
• Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
2
Views
227
• Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
0
Views
356
• Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
633
• High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K