Why are disconnected diagrams dropped from S-Matrix

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LedPhoton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagrams S-matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the treatment of disconnected diagrams in perturbative quantum field theory, specifically in the context of calculating S-matrix elements. It highlights that disconnected diagrams, such as those arising from real scalar fields with both Phi^3 and Phi^6 interactions, are typically omitted from calculations. The reasoning provided indicates that interference effects between connected and disconnected diagrams average out when considering relative temporal and spatial separations of scattering events, leading to a simplified product of S-matrix contributions. This reflects a common practice in quantum field theory to streamline calculations by excluding terms that do not contribute to observable outcomes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of perturbative quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with S-matrix elements and correlation functions
  • Knowledge of real scalar fields and interaction terms (Phi^3 and Phi^6)
  • Concept of quantum interference in scattering processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the role of disconnected diagrams in quantum field theory calculations
  • Learn about the implications of averaging over temporal and spatial separations in scattering events
  • Explore the mathematical formulation of S-matrix contributions in perturbative approaches
  • Investigate specific examples of quantum interference in particle scattering processes
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, theoretical physicists, and students of quantum field theory seeking to deepen their understanding of S-matrix calculations and the significance of connected versus disconnected diagrams.

LedPhoton
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am talking about perturbative quantum field theory. When calculating elements of correlation functions(which then I use to calculate S-matrix elements) one always comes up with connected and disconnected diagrams. These disconnected diagrams are usually dropped from the calculation and I wonder why. Note that I am not talking about vacuum-vacuum diagrams.
I'll give an example, suppose you have real scalar field with a Phi^3 interaction AND a Phi^6 interaction. A 2Phi->4Phi particle scattering can happen in at least two ways (as calculated from a six point correlating function):
One 6-point vertex in which 2 initial particles enter and 4 final particles exit.
Two 3-point vertex. In each vertex 1 initial particle enters and 2 final particles exit.
It seems to be tacitly assumed that the second diagram may be dropped. In most cases we may understand these to be two separate processes, but there must be some cases in which the two terms contribute to the same process: there must be quantum interference between the terms.
Is there some process that kills this interference? Why is the disconnected diagram usually dropped?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not an expert on this, but I remember that the interferences drop out as you average over the relative temporal/ spatial separation of the scattering events. You finally get a simple product of the averaged S-matrix contribution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K