Fusion, bigger output than input?

In summary, the statement "Fusion has bigger output than input" means that the amount of energy produced by a fusion reaction is greater than the amount of energy needed to initiate the reaction. However, in order to achieve this, the reaction must take place under specific conditions such as high temperature and density. Otherwise, the output may be less than the input due to energy conversion losses.
  • #1
John Mcrain
435
28
Fusion has bigger output then input, because produce more energy than to initiate reaction.
This is allways case, for example 100kg of wood burning produce much more energy then initiate fire with one match fire.

Can someone explain this statement?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Of course, any source of energy must produce more than it consumes, otherwise it is not a source. Fusion has the potential to produce huge amounts of energy for little input, hence its appeal. But current technology is not there yet.
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost
  • #3
DrClaude said:
Of course, any source of energy must produce more than it consumes, otherwise it is not a source. Fusion has the potential to produce huge amounts of energy for little input, hence its appeal. But current technology is not there yet.
So why they emphasize "bigger output than input"?
 
  • #4
John Mcrain said:
So why they emphasize "bigger output than input"?
Because this is the next milestone in fusion.
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost and vanhees71
  • #5
John Mcrain said:
So why they emphasize "bigger output than input"?
Who is "they"? Please always post links to your reading when asking questions like this. Thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff, artis and Vanadium 50
  • #6
Fusing two iron nuclei needs more energy than you get out of it.

If the goal is a power plant then people choose reactions that release energy, of course. In that case the total final energy (not including the rest energy of particles) is always larger than the initial energy (same accounting). That's not enough for a power plant, however. With most reactions you only get heat as output. Converting heat back to electricity has an efficiency of around 1/3. There are other losses in the system, too, and you often need power for cooling, heating and other things. A power plant needs to induce fusion very efficiently to counter all these losses.
 
  • #7
John Mcrain said:
Fusion has bigger output then input, because produce more energy than to initiate reaction.
This is allways case, for example 100kg of wood burning produce much more energy then initiate fire with one match fire.

Can someone explain this statement?
It's an easy question but it doesn't have an easy answer.

A short answer would read something like this. Not all nuclear reactions are exothermic (releasing energy) there are also endothermic (taking up more energy to start than they release in the process) so exothermic reactions are "rolling downhill" while endothermic are "pushing uphill".

Nuclear fusion of common isotopes of hydrogen like deuterium and tritium are giving off energy much like Uranium fission does, the energy given away is mostly the kinetic energy of the particles like neutrons, and alpha particles. You can turn this energy into heat. In fact it turns into heat whether we want it or not, it's just a consequence of fast moving particles moving through surrounding matter.
"Fusion has bigger output then input, because produce more energy than to initiate reaction."

This is true only if you phrase the statement correctly.
A fusion reaction where two, say for example, deuterium nuclei fuse releases more energy than the kinetic energy needed to "smash" (overcome the coulumb electric field repelling the nuclei) those two nuclei together, that would be true.
But in order to get those nuclei to such fast speeds we need to add energy to them, we do this by heating the substance they are in (plasma) this heating is not 100% efficient nor are the fusion reactions 100% efficient (nuclei don't always fuse, they can scatter or lose energy by escaping the plasma etc )
So in order to get more final electrical energy out than we put in to heat the plasma we need the plasma to be dense enough, hot enough for long enough, otherwise what we get out is less than we put in because the lower output combined with the energy conversion losses gives a diminished return.So just because a reaction gives away extra energy doesn't always mean that it will start or continue without the right circumstances.

You can see this by pouring too much diesel on a cold small flame, instead of burning it will extinguish the flame as it it was water. On the other hand put the right amount of diesel fuel within a closed space , apply certain amount of energy to it - by compression which causes rapid heating of the fuel and it ignites giving more energy than was used to compress it.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke

1. What is fusion and how does it work?

Fusion is a process in which two or more atomic nuclei combine to form a heavier nucleus, releasing a large amount of energy in the process. This is the same process that powers the sun and other stars. In order for fusion to occur, the nuclei must overcome their natural repulsion and come close enough together for the strong nuclear force to bind them together.

2. How is fusion different from fission?

Fission is the process of splitting an atomic nucleus into two or more smaller nuclei, releasing energy in the process. This is the process used in nuclear power plants. Fusion, on the other hand, involves combining smaller nuclei to form a larger one. While both processes release energy, fusion releases significantly more energy and produces less radioactive waste.

3. Can fusion produce more energy than it takes to initiate the reaction?

Yes, fusion can produce more energy than it takes to initiate the reaction. This is known as a "net energy gain." However, achieving a net energy gain is still a challenge and requires precise conditions and extreme temperatures and pressures.

4. What are the potential benefits of fusion with a bigger output than input?

The potential benefits of fusion with a bigger output than input are numerous. It could provide a nearly limitless source of clean energy, as the fuel used in fusion reactions is abundant and produces minimal waste. It could also reduce our dependence on fossil fuels and help mitigate the effects of climate change.

5. What are the current challenges in achieving fusion with a bigger output than input?

One of the main challenges in achieving fusion with a bigger output than input is creating the extreme conditions necessary for fusion to occur. This requires temperatures of over 100 million degrees Celsius and pressures millions of times greater than Earth's atmosphere. Additionally, containing and controlling the extremely hot and energetic plasma is a major technical challenge that scientists are still working to overcome.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
0
Views
223
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top