Understanding the G- and C-parity of the pi^0 decay

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter copernicus1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the G- and C-parity of the pi^0 decay, focusing on the implications of isospin and the effects of rotations in isospin space. Participants explore theoretical aspects related to particle physics and symmetry properties.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the C-parity of the pi^0 is +1 due to its decay into two photons, while its isospin ket is $$|1,0\rangle$$, leading to confusion about why its G-parity is -1.
  • Another participant challenges the correctness of the isospin ket notation, asserting it is |1,0> and later acknowledges a mistake in the initial claim.
  • A participant notes the difficulty in understanding the rotation in isospin space, mentioning that after a 180-degree rotation, the isospin vector remains in the x-y plane, yet the G-parity differs from the C-parity.
  • Another participant suggests that the behavior observed is expected for an isovector, explaining that a 180° rotation about the I2 axis results in changes to the isospin components, specifically that π+ and π- are linear combinations of I1 and I2, while π0 corresponds to the I3 component, which changes sign.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the interpretation of the isospin ket and the implications of the rotation in isospin space. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on the relationship between G-parity and C-parity.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about isospin rotations and the definitions of G-parity and C-parity, which are not fully explored in the discussion.

copernicus1
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
Since the pi^0 decays to two photons its C-parity is +1, but its isospin ket is $$|1,0\rangle,$$ which makes it a little tricky to understand why its G-parity is -1. Does the rotation around the I_2 axis somehow generate a minus sign? This seems odd since the isospin ket points into the x-y plane, so it seems the rotation by pi wouldn't affect it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That doesn't look right. It's |1,0>.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
That doesn't look right. It's |1,0>.

You're right that was just a mistake; I fixed it. This is what makes the rotation in isospin space hard to understand. Initially it's pointing into the x-y plane, and after a 180 degree rotation it's still into the x-y plane, but somehow the G-parity is different from the C-parity.
 
Isn't this what you'd expect for an isovector? Under a 180° rotation about the I2 axis, I1 → - I1, I2 → I2, I3 → -I3. And in the spherical basis, π+ and π- are linear combinations of I1 and I2, and π0 is the I3 component, so it changes sign.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K