G-Force Accelerometer conversion to Pounds per Square Inch

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around converting G-Force readings from a Herman Digital Trainer, which measures the impact of punches and kicks, into Pounds per Square Inch (PSI). The conversation explores the relationship between acceleration, force, and pressure, and seeks a conversion equation or method for this transformation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about converting G-Force readings into PSI, providing background on the Herman Digital Trainer's measurement process and calculations.
  • Another participant clarifies that G-Force is an acceleration and pressure is a force per unit area, suggesting that a direct conversion is not feasible.
  • A participant acknowledges the distinction but proposes that since both measurements relate to impact intensity, a link between them might exist.
  • One participant outlines a potential method involving converting acceleration to force and then to pressure, noting that additional data about the area of impact and mass is necessary for accuracy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of converting G-Force to PSI. While some acknowledge the complexity and lack of a straightforward conversion, others suggest that a relationship may still be established through additional calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that accurate conversion would depend on specific parameters such as the area of impact and the mass of the body parts involved, which are not provided in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals involved in sports science, biomechanics, or those seeking to understand the relationship between impact forces and pressure measurements in physical training contexts.

MAPhysics
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So, the title says it all. background info on this question. I purchased a Herman Digital Trainer. It measure the impact of punches and kicks based on G-Forces. I was wondering if it was possible to a G-Force reading into Pounds per square inch reading.

This is the websites description of the calculations used:
The Herman sensors are queried every 10ms. The sensor returns the highest reading for each axis (X,Y, and Z) that it has read since the last time it was queried.

The value is subtracted from the resting/idle value for that axis.

Herman takes the three axis readings and determines the magnitude of the sensor reading using standard vector math. This effectively takes into account the energy from all three axis simultaneously.

Vector Magnitude = square root (X*X + Y*Y + Z*Z)

This value is then scaled from a digital reading to G forces knowing the maximum reading on each sensor is 40G.

This value is then multiplied by 2 yielding the score for this sensor reading. Effectively, the scores in Herman are two times the G force of the impact. A score of 20 correlates to an impact of 10G on the accelerometer.

If someone is able to assist me by giving me a conversion equation it would be most appreciative. Note. Highest form of math I've taken is Calculus, I will be taking Physics 213 in the fall, so I might need an explanation of the equation. Thank you for taking the time to read this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
G-Force is not a force; it's an acceleration. Pressure is not a force either: it's a force per unit area. So there won't be a simple conversion: that's like asking for a conversion between degrees and gallons.
 
I figured that. But they are both being used to determine how hard the impact of your punch and kick. So I assume there has to be a way to link the two.
 
Acceleration in G (a=readingx9.81) -> Force by (f=ma) -> Pressure by (P=F/A)

Obiously you'll need some data about the area of punch A and mass of the parts accelerated.

This is by no means totally accurate but gives a nice ballpark figure.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
18K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
12K