Gain Across a Band on PNA: Is it an FFT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lennybogzy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Band Fft Gain
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether the gain measured across a band on a PNA (Precision Network Analyzer) can be considered an FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) or if this characterization is incorrect. Participants explore the operational principles of PNAs and the distinctions between different types of frequency analysis methods.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if measuring gain on a PNA can be equated to performing an FFT.
  • Another participant explains that older instruments performed frequency sweeps, suggesting that an FFT requires specific conditions not met by PNAs.
  • A different participant clarifies the operation of a VNA (Vector Network Analyzer), noting that it uses a synthesizer and mixers to measure responses, and distinguishes between FFT analyzers and VNAs.
  • One participant shares an anecdote about a misunderstanding during a job interview regarding the terminology used to describe gain measurements.
  • Another participant asserts that while the measurement is related to a Fourier transform, it should not be labeled as an FFT, indicating a common misuse of the term.
  • A participant seeks clarification on the distinction between direct measurements and computed results in the context of Fourier transforms.
  • Another participant elaborates on the physical reality of Fourier transforms and discusses the common confusion between FFT and other types of transforms, emphasizing the importance of precise terminology.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the terminology and conceptual understanding of the measurements taken by PNAs, with no consensus reached on whether it is appropriate to refer to these measurements as FFTs.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity regarding definitions and the operational principles of different measurement instruments, indicating potential misunderstandings in terminology and methodology.

lennybogzy
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
Does a PNA show FFT

If I'm looking at gain across a band on a PNA could one say that I'm looking at an FFT or is that complete nonsense?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Older instruments performed a frequency sweep and recorded the response at each frequency. To use an FFT you would need to excite with a delta function, measure the impulse response, and perform the transform. I don't think that even modern PNA's do that...
 
Last edited:
No, that is not how a VNA works (PNA is an Agilent acronym, I have no idea what the P stands for). A VNA basically performs a frequency sweep using a syntheziser and then records the response using a mixer where the RF comes from the DUT ans the LO comes from the syntheziser (there are actually several mixers involved in the detection, since a VNA measures the vector response).

There are FFT analyzers out there (and they are called FFT analysers, do distinguish them from spectrum analyzers, scalar analyzers and VNAs), but they are limited to relatively low frequencies (a few hundred kHz, the ones I use go upp to 100 kHz).

There are a few good Application notes on the Agilient website which described how their PNAs work in some detail.
 
Being interviewed for a position: the guy interviewing me cut me off with something like "so you were looking at an FFT" (I was talking about gain in k-band). I started to correct him but he was adamant about me "looking at an FFT" so I kinda let it go.
 
Well you are looking at an FT it's not an FFT, but people like the word FFT too much these days.
 
Come again? FT - Fourier transform? What do you mean?

My understanding is that I'm looking at something directly measured, rather than 'computed' in that sense
 
Last edited:
You are right, butl the Fourier transform does have physical reality in a lot of cases. If you add two batteries in series the output voltage is the sum of the voltages. You would still call it a sum even if it is not computed.
A frequency vs. power spectrum represents the absolute value squared of the signal in frequency space. There are examples of naturally occurring Fourier transforms for example in optics.
The FFT on the other hand is actually a "Fast Fourier Transform" a special algorithm to get a frequency spectrum. But people mix their words all the time and call any Fourier transform an FFT even if a DCT (a similar algorithm) was calculated or if the spectrum does not have a computational origin at all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K