MHB Galois Theory: Textbook recommendations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kiwi1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook Theory
Kiwi1
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
I have been working my way through the book "A book of Abstract Algebra" by Charles C. Pinter. By the time I get to the end it will have taken me 2 years of self study, solving every exercise during my daily commute. A great little book!

The last two chapters are titled:

Chapter 32: Galois Theory: The heart of the matter
Chapter 33: Solving equations by radicals

Can anyone recommend a book on Galois theory for me to choose as my next "project"? If you happen to know Pinter's book even better because it really suits my style and is at a good level for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Kiwi,

You might enjoy "Galois Theory" by Emil Artin and "Galois Theory for Beginners: A Historical Perspective" by Jorg Bewersdorff.
 
Kiwi said:
I have been working my way through the book "A book of Abstract Algebra" by Charles C. Pinter. By the time I get to the end it will have taken me 2 years of self study, solving every exercise during my daily commute. A great little book!

The last two chapters are titled:

Chapter 32: Galois Theory: The heart of the matter
Chapter 33: Solving equations by radicals

Can anyone recommend a book on Galois theory for me to choose as my next "project"? If you happen to know Pinter's book even better because it really suits my style and is at a good level for me.
Hi Kiwi ...A possible text would be ...Galois Theory (Second Edition) by David Cox (Wiley 2012)I have only just purchased the book ... but at first glance it looks pretty good ...Peter
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
174
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top