Gas conductance through tube at low pressure

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing a tube to achieve a constant pressure change rate of 2.5 mbar/sec in a vacuum chamber as pressure decreases from atmospheric levels to 0.5 mbar. Initially, the user considers using PV=nRT and Poiseuille's law for calculations, but faces challenges as the flow transitions from laminar to turbulent near the end of the pumpdown process. It is noted that a fixed tube radius will not maintain a constant pressure decrease due to varying mass flow rates influenced by chamber gas density and pressure drop. A control system, including a pressure transmitter and adjustable flow control valve, is recommended to manage the pressure change effectively. The complexity of the flow dynamics at low pressures suggests that linear calculations may not be applicable.
soothsayer
Messages
422
Reaction score
5
I have a vacuum chamber of volume V connected to a vacuum pump via a tube of radius R and length L, and I want to design this "tube" such that R can be controlled in order to provide a constant rate of pressure change inside of the chamber of 2.5 mbar/sec, from atmosphere down to ~0.5mbar. Assume that pumping speed is infinite, so my flow rate is entirely limited by the conductance of my adjustable tube.

At the beginning of chamber pumpdown, I feel like I should be able to apply a combination of PV=nRT and Poiseuille's law to convert my 2.5mbar rate of pressure change into a desired flow rate, and then into an effective tube radius. When I do this, I get a result that feels pretty intuitive based on my experience. (Does this seem like a valid calculation to anyone else or have I already made an error here?)

But nearing the end of the pumpdown process, I suspect I can no longer apply Poiseuille's law in the same way since I no longer have laminar gas flow. When I try to apply the same equations the same way I get a resulting effective radius that is much smaller than would make sense. Is there a different equation I can use to calculate a required tube radius in this low pressure regime? Does it even make sense to be trying to calculate this when my desired change in pressure (2.5mbar/s) is larger than my chamber pressure (0.5mbar)? It doesn't feel like I can treat pressure over time as linear here.

Any advice for tackling this problem would be appreciated!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
This sketch is my understanding of your problem:
Vacuum.jpg

The Poiseuille equation applies to the incompressible laminar flow of a Newtonian fluid. Air is Newtonian, the Reynolds number needs to calculated to find if the flow is laminar, and this flow is definitely not incompressible.

Your goal is to get a constant rate of pressure decrease in the vacuum chamber. That requires a constant mass flow rate out of the chamber. At the start, the pressure (and the density) in the chamber is high, and the pressure drop is high. Near the end, the pressure (and the density) in the chamber is low, and the pressure drop is low. Regardless of whether the flow in the tube is laminar or turbulent, the mass flow rate will be a function of chamber gas density and pressure drop in the tube. The mass flow rate will be high at the beginning, and decrease as the pressure in the vacuum chamber decreases.

A fixed restriction, whether a tube or an orifice, will not get you a constant rate of pressure decrease in the vacuum chamber. Unless somebody has a better idea, I think you will need some sort of control system. A pressure transmitter, ramp controller, and air flow control valve would do what you want.
 
soothsayer said:
I have a vacuum chamber of volume V connected to a vacuum pump via a tube of radius R and length L, and I want to design this "tube" such that R can be controlled in order to provide a constant rate of pressure change inside of the chamber of 2.5 mbar/sec, from atmosphere down to ~0.5mbar. Assume that pumping speed is infinite, so my flow rate is entirely limited by the conductance of my adjustable tube.

At the beginning of chamber pumpdown, I feel like I should be able to apply a combination of PV=nRT and Poiseuille's law to convert my 2.5mbar rate of pressure change into a desired flow rate, and then into an effective tube radius. When I do this, I get a result that feels pretty intuitive based on my experience. (Does this seem like a valid calculation to anyone else or have I already made an error here?)

But nearing the end of the pumpdown process, I suspect I can no longer apply Poiseuille's law in the same way since I no longer have laminar gas flow. When I try to apply the same equations the same way I get a resulting effective radius that is much smaller than would make sense. Is there a different equation I can use to calculate a required tube radius in this low pressure regime? Does it even make sense to be trying to calculate this when my desired change in pressure (2.5mbar/s) is larger than my chamber pressure (0.5mbar)? It doesn't feel like I can treat pressure over time as linear here.

Any advice for tackling this problem would be appreciated!
Hi There!

This is a super fun problem. Are you still looking for help?

Check out the PDF by Genick Bar-Meir, "Fundamentals of Compressible Fluid Mechanics"

Let me know if you need help.
 
jrmichler said:
I think you will need some sort of control system. A pressure transmitter, ramp controller, and air flow control valve would do what you want.
Yep. This!
You will absolutely have to have a some flow control "valve" that can be adjusted. You will also need a pressure sensor to measure what you ultimately want. The rest is just a (nonlinear) control system to make it work.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top