Gas Molecules in Motion: An Exploration of Physics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the motion of gas molecules and their relationship to temperature. Gas molecules do not move randomly when not colliding; instead, they travel in straight lines until elastic collisions occur. The temperature of a gas is primarily determined by the kinetic energy of its particles, while internal energy can influence temperature under certain conditions. Increasing potential energy does not directly raise temperature, as demonstrated by the behavior of systems at thermal equilibrium and the effects of elastic potential energy on temperature changes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic and potential energy concepts
  • Familiarity with thermodynamics principles, specifically U=TdS-PdV
  • Knowledge of elastic collisions and their impact on particle motion
  • Basic grasp of temperature definitions and thermal equilibrium
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the relationship between kinetic energy and temperature in gases
  • Study thermodynamic equations, particularly U=TdS-PdV, in detail
  • Investigate the effects of elastic potential energy on temperature changes
  • Learn about the behavior of particles in thermal equilibrium systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, thermodynamics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of gas behavior and temperature dynamics.

Forest1239879
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Do the molecules of a gas move randomly when they aren't colliding, or is it only when they have elastic collisions with other molecules? I know it's a retarded question, I don't know much about physics.

Also, does the temperature of a body depend on the internal energy of it, or just kinetic energy? If you increase the potential energy are you increasing the temp?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey, I am not quite sure what your getting at with the first question, but for the temperature of a body would normaly down to the thermal energey of an object, I believe kinetic energy would increase the temperature, but that would be down to the friction acting upon it, as friction generates heat. Increasing potential energy will increase the acceleration on the object, meaning giving it a greater force of gravitation on the object, which I do not believe would increase the temperature of the body.
 
Hi Forest,
The random motion is due entirely to elastic collisions. In certain situations (namely plasmas), you can have very complex motion without collisions - but still in no way random.
Without the collisions, they'll just fly straight.

The temperature of a body, especially a gas, is essentially synonymous with the kinetic energy of its particles. In a simplified ideal situation, the internal energies of the particles do not effect the temperature. In practical, real situations - that's not entirely true. When the molecules or particles interact with each-other or external bodies, often their internal energy will be transferred of otherwise converted - letting those internal energies effect the temperature.
 
Do the molecules of a gas move randomly when they aren't colliding?
no. if there are no collisions each particle will act like a billiard ball, with angles of incidence equal to angles of reflection.

does the temperature of a body depend on the internal energy of it?
yes, since U=TdS-PdV, which means the internal energy is equal to temperature times a small change in entropy minus pressure times a small change in volume.

If you increase the potential energy are you increasing the temp?
i don't think so. if we increased the mass of Earth i don't think temps would change. if we compressed a spring, the mass on the end would not get hotter.

imagine you have a partitioned system at thermal equalibrium. is there any potential we can add to one side that would cause heat transfer as a direct cause and not due to the effects of masses or charges moving?
i would imagine decreasing the PE of one side would influence particles from the other side to find a lower energy until at equlibrium, meaning decreasing the potential would increase the probability of positive influx. this arguabley means that the high PE side is hotter than the low PE side, but i think this is a mixed up analogy (based on "hot stuff flows into cold stuff").

even the definition of temperature is a bit confusing... something like "the thing that remains constant as energy changes with entropy" or T=dE/dS. I think we have to consider the center of mass frame to determine temperature, otherwise thermal motion gets confused with the motion

if we consider 8 inert atoms in a zero kelvin solid lattice and increase the mass of the planet they are on, will this increase the temperature? there may be an increase in motion to find the new lowest energy states and the system will oscilate, becoming dampened with time, until it is at rest again... unless it oscilates continually, thereby increasing its temp for a long time.

but i still don't think potential energy increases temp... just a gut feeling though
 
Interestingly, it can be shown via thermodynamics that stretching a spring elastically (which increases its potential energy) causes either an increase or decrease in temperature, depending on whether the spring material has a negative or positive coefficient of thermal expansion, respectively. You can experiment with this by stretching a thick rubber band, waiting a few seconds so that it equilibrates to room temperature, releasing it, and putting it to your lips (our handy built-in temperature sensor!). It should have cooled noticeably.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
21K