Gauge choice for a magnetic vector potential

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the verification of conditions on the magnetic vector potential \( \vec{A} \) as potential gauge choices. Participants explore various forms of gauge conditions, including those involving arbitrary vector fields and integral constraints, within the context of gauge theory in electromagnetism and quantum field theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the validity of conditions like \( \vec{A} \times \vec{F}(r,t) \) as a gauge choice, with one suggesting that it may be too constrained.
  • There is a proposal that a condition such as \( \int\int \vec{A} \times \vec{F}(r,t) dS = 0 \) could be acceptable as a gauge.
  • Another participant raises the possibility of using a more general condition like \( \int\int L(\vec{A}) \times \vec{F}(r,t) dS = 0 \), where \( L \) is a linear operator.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about gauge constraints involving integrals, questioning their complexity and potential utility.
  • Another participant suggests that the ultimate validation of any gauge condition lies in checking that the resulting physical fields \( \vec{E} \) and \( \vec{B} \) solve the problem at hand.
  • References to additional gauge fixing conditions in the literature, including temporal and axial gauges, are mentioned, along with the \( R_{\xi} \) gauges based on the action principle.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity and complexity of various gauge conditions, with no consensus reached on the acceptability of integral constraints as gauge choices.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the limitations of their proposed conditions, such as the potential over-constraining of gauge choices and the need for validation through physical solutions.

Lodeg
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
How do we verify whether a condition on the magnetic vector potential A constitutes a possible gauge choice ?
Specifically, could a relation in the form A x F(r,t) be a gauge , where F is an arbitrary vector field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do we verify whether a condition on the magnetic vector potential A constitutes a possible gauge choice ?
Specifically, could a relation in the form: A x F(r,t) = 0, be a gauge , where F is an arbitrary vector field?
 
This looks a bit too much constrained, because it practically says that ##\vec{A}=\lambda \vec{F}##, but you can impose only one "scalar" condition like
$$\frac{1}{c} \partial_t \Phi + \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{A}=0 \qquad \text{(Lorenz gauge)},$$
$$\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{A}=0 \qquad \text{(Coulomb gauge)}.$$
 
In that case, would a condition like ∫∫ A x F(r,t) dS = 0 , be acceptable as a guage?
 
More generally, could a condition like ∫∫ L(A) x F(r,t) dS = 0 be a gauge, where L is a linear operator?
 
I've never seen gauge-constraints involving integrals. This looks very complicated. What do you think it may be good for?
 
This allows simplifying some expressions.

Are there any criteria to judge the validity of such a condition?

Are there any reference that mention different gauge conditions other than Coulomb and Lorenz conditions?
 
Well, if it helps you with a concrete example, the only validation is to check that the final solutions for the physical fields, ##\vec{E}## and ##\vec{B}##, really solve the problem. In the literature there are also more gauge fixing conditions, particularly in QFT. Some simple ones are temporal gauge, ##A^0=0##, or axial gauge ##A^3=0##, and also the ##R_{\xi}## gauges, based on the action principle rather than a specific constraint for the gauge fields. There are also some more less common ones. See

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauge_fixing
 
Thank you very much
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
763
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
979