Gauss Divergence Theorem - Silly doubt - Almost solved

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Gauss' Divergence Theorem in solving a homework problem involving vector fields. The user initially posed a question about separating the x and y components of the vector field into distinct equations. The consensus is that this separation is valid, provided the boundary is partitioned appropriately to express the components as functions of x and y. This method aligns with the proof of the theorem found in standard Calculus texts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' Divergence Theorem
  • Familiarity with vector calculus concepts
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in integrals
  • Basic proficiency in calculus and mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the proof of Gauss' Divergence Theorem in a Calculus textbook
  • Explore vector field partitioning techniques
  • Study applications of the Divergence Theorem in physics and engineering
  • Practice problems involving the separation of vector components in integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students studying vector calculus, educators teaching Gauss' Divergence Theorem, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of mathematical proofs in calculus.

come2ershad
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem statement has been attached with this post.

Homework Equations



I considered u = ux i + uy j and unit normal n = nx i + ny j.


The Attempt at a Solution



I used gauss' divergence theorem. Then it came as integral [(dux/dx) d(omega)] + integral [(duy/dy) d(omega)] = integral [(ux nx d(gamma)] + integral [(uy ny d(gamma)]

My question is can I separate the x and y components and write as separate equations as given in the problem? Is that right?
 

Attachments

  • db.jpg
    db.jpg
    23.2 KB · Views: 483
Physics news on Phys.org
anybody?
 
You can, although it is not trivial to prove it. Break up the boundary so that the components of the vector can be written as functions of x on each piece and use x itself as parameter. That will give the first equation.

Then break up the boundary so the components of the vector can be written as functions of y on each piece and use y itself as parameter. That will give the second equation.

That partitioning is used in the proof of the theorem. You might want to look at the proof in any Calculus text.
 
Thanks for the reply.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K