Gauss Law and a hollow spherical shell

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves applying Gauss's Law to determine the electric field in three distinct regions surrounding a hollow spherical shell with a specified charge density. The charge density is given as a function of radius, raising questions about its implications for calculating enclosed charge.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the charge density and its units, questioning the integration process for calculating enclosed charge within the Gaussian surface. There is a focus on understanding how to properly express the element of charge in relation to volume.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, clarifying the correct approach to integrating the charge density. Some guidance has been provided regarding the proper formulation of charge elements and the integration limits, though no consensus has been reached on the overall solution.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the implications of the charge density's units and how it affects the integration process for finding the total charge enclosed. Participants are navigating the constraints of the problem setup without resolving the overall question.

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
A hollow spherical shell carries a charge density
[tex]\rho = \frac{k}{r^2}[/tex]

in the region a<= r <= b. As in the figure
Find the elctric field in these three regions
i) r <a
ii) a<r<b
iii) r>b

SOlution:
for r<a it simple.. no exclosed charge for any gaussian sphere within that region so E = 0

for a<r<b
the thing which stumps is the charge density... isn't charge density given in coulombs per cubic metre usually??

what I am concerned about in the enclosed charge in the gaussian sphere of radius a<r<b... would i integrate rho from r' = a to r' = r??

rho dot dr would give the total charge enclosed, no??

doing that gives
[tex]q_{enc} = k\left(\frac{1}{a} - \frac{1}{r}\right)[/tex]

[tex]E (4 \pi r^2) = \frac{k}{epsilon_{0}} \left(\frac{1}{a} - \frac{1}{r}\right)<br /> <br /> for the third part that is r>b would i do something similar but integrate from r' =a to r'=b?? <br /> <br /> Please help!<br /> <br /> Help is always greatly appreciated![/tex]
 

Attachments

  • noise.JPG
    noise.JPG
    11.2 KB · Views: 486
Physics news on Phys.org
stunner5000pt said:
for a<r<b
the thing which stumps is the charge density... isn't charge density given in coulombs per cubic metre usually??
Absolutely. Which means that k has what units?

what I am concerned about in the enclosed charge in the gaussian sphere of radius a<r<b... would i integrate rho from r' = a to r' = r??
Yes.

rho dot dr would give the total charge enclosed, no??
No! An element of charge would be rho dV, not rho dr. rho is the charge density per unit volume.
 
Doc Al said:
Absolutely. Which means that k has what units?

No! An element of charge would be rho dV, not rho dr. rho is the charge density per unit volume.

so K has units of C/m

so i should be integrating rho dV but still r'=a to r'=r

thanks for the help
 
stunner5000pt said:
so K has units of C/m

so i should be integrating rho dV but still r'=a to r'=r
Yes and yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
785
Replies
9
Views
2K