Gauss Law and a hollow spherical shell

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 3K views
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
A hollow spherical shell carries a charge density
[tex]\rho = \frac{k}{r^2}[/tex]

in the region a<= r <= b. As in the figure
Find the elctric field in these three regions
i) r <a
ii) a<r<b
iii) r>b

SOlution:
for r<a it simple.. no exclosed charge for any gaussian sphere within that region so E = 0

for a<r<b
the thing which stumps is the charge density... isn't charge density given in coulombs per cubic metre usually??

what I am concerned about in the enclosed charge in the gaussian sphere of radius a<r<b... would i integrate rho from r' = a to r' = r??

rho dot dr would give the total charge enclosed, no??

doing that gives
[tex]q_{enc} = k\left(\frac{1}{a} - \frac{1}{r}\right)[/tex]

[tex]E (4 \pi r^2) = \frac{k}{epsilon_{0}} \left(\frac{1}{a} - \frac{1}{r}\right)<br /> <br /> for the third part that is r>b would i do something similar but integrate from r' =a to r'=b?? <br /> <br /> Please help!<br /> <br /> Help is always greatly appreciated![/tex]
 

Attachments

  • noise.JPG
    noise.JPG
    11.2 KB · Views: 503
Physics news on Phys.org
stunner5000pt said:
for a<r<b
the thing which stumps is the charge density... isn't charge density given in coulombs per cubic metre usually??
Absolutely. Which means that k has what units?

what I am concerned about in the enclosed charge in the gaussian sphere of radius a<r<b... would i integrate rho from r' = a to r' = r??
Yes.

rho dot dr would give the total charge enclosed, no??
No! An element of charge would be rho dV, not rho dr. rho is the charge density per unit volume.
 
Doc Al said:
Absolutely. Which means that k has what units?

No! An element of charge would be rho dV, not rho dr. rho is the charge density per unit volume.

so K has units of C/m

so i should be integrating rho dV but still r'=a to r'=r

thanks for the help
 
stunner5000pt said:
so K has units of C/m

so i should be integrating rho dV but still r'=a to r'=r
Yes and yes.