Undergrad Gauss' Theorem -- Why two different notations are used?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the notational differences in Gauss' Theorem as presented in the Sixth and Fifth Editions of "Mathematical Methods for Physicists." The notation ##\partial V## in Equation (1.101a) refers to the boundary surface of a region ##V##, while the Sixth Edition emphasizes the distinction between double and triple integrals. The change in notation likely reflects an editorial decision to enhance clarity for readers. Overall, the differences are primarily notational, with no impact on the underlying mathematical principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' Theorem
  • Familiarity with double and triple integrals
  • Knowledge of mathematical notation in physics
  • Basic concepts of vector calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the differences between the Fifth and Sixth Editions of "Mathematical Methods for Physicists"
  • Study the implications of notation in mathematical physics
  • Learn about Stokes' Theorem and its relation to Gauss' Theorem
  • Explore advanced topics in vector calculus, focusing on integrals over surfaces and volumes
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mathematicians, and educators seeking clarity on the notational conventions in mathematical physics, particularly regarding Gauss' Theorem.

sams
Gold Member
Messages
84
Reaction score
2
In Mathematical Methods for Physicists, Sixth Edition, Page 60, Section 1.11, the Gauss' theorem is written as:
Gauss' Theorem.PNG

In Mathematical Methods for Physicists, Fifth Edition, Page 61, Section 1.11, the Gauss' theorem is written as:
Gauss' Theorem 2.jpeg

Kindly I would like to know please:
1. What is the difference between the two relations?
2. What does ##\partial{V}## in Equation (1.101a) stands for? In physics, I realized that ##\partial{V}## is usually not included when Gauss' theorem is used, why is that?

Thanks a lot for your help...
 

Attachments

  • Gauss' Theorem.PNG
    Gauss' Theorem.PNG
    2.5 KB · Views: 988
  • Gauss' Theorem 2.jpeg
    Gauss' Theorem 2.jpeg
    3.7 KB · Views: 870
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
sams said:
In Mathematical Methods for Physicists, Sixth Edition, Page 60, Section 1.11, the Gauss' theorem is written as:
View attachment 231423
In Mathematical Methods for Physicists, Fifth Edition, Page 61, Section 1.11, the Gauss' theorem is written as:
View attachment 231424
Kindly I would like to know please:
1. What is the difference between the two relations?
2. What does ##\partial{V}## in Equation (1.101a) stands for? In physics, I realized that ##\partial{V}## is usually not included when Gauss' theorem is used, why is that?

Thanks a lot for your help...

Do these books not make their notation clear? The only difference is notational.

##\partial V## is sometimes used for the surface of a region ##V##. In the second equation, simply ##S## is used for the surface of the region ##V##.
 
  • Like
Likes sams
The notation used by the sixth edition was to remind the reader that the left hand side is a double integral over the surface of the region and the right hand side is a triple integral over the volume of the region. They likely changed it as someone brought it to their attention or an editor schooled as a physicist took issue and decided it was best to change it.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and sams
Usually un physics triple or double integrals $$\int \int$$ $$\int \int \int$$
Are changed by only one simbol $$\int$$, so that is the same equation.

The simbol $$\partial v$$ means that the integral Is computed on boundary superfice of $$v$$ or on boundary of $$v$$.
$$\partial v=S$$
 
  • Like
Likes sams
Thank you all for your help and for your explanations
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
651
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
21K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K