Gaussian Integral Using Residues

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the evaluation of the Gaussian integral using contour integration techniques. The integral in question is I = ∫_{-∞}^∞ e^{-x^2} dx, which the user attempts to solve by considering the contour integral ∫_C e^{-z^2} dz over a half-circle in the upper-half plane. The user identifies a critical mistake in their approach, realizing that the Gaussian function diverges on the arc of the contour, leading to a conclusion that the integral equals zero, which contradicts the known result of √π. The discussion highlights the challenges of using contour integration for this specific integral and suggests alternative methods.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of contour integration in complex analysis
  • Familiarity with the Gaussian function and its properties
  • Knowledge of limits and behavior of functions at infinity
  • Basic concepts of complex variables and integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the evaluation of Gaussian integrals using polar coordinates
  • Learn about the residue theorem and its applications in complex analysis
  • Research alternative methods for evaluating integrals, such as the method of completing the square
  • Explore the article on contour integration from the American Mathematical Monthly for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in advanced integration techniques, particularly those exploring the Gaussian integral and contour integration methods.

ghotra
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
I am trying to to the Gaussian integral using contour integration.

What terrible mistake have I made.

<br /> I = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \mathrm{e}^{-x^2} \mathrm{d}x<br />

I consider the following integral:

<br /> \int_C \mathrm{e}^{-z^2} \mathrm{d}z<br />

where C is the half-circle (of infinite radius) in the upper-half plane.
There are no singularities in the upper-half plane. So,

<br /> \int_C \mathrm{e}^{-z^2} \mathrm{d}z = 0<br />

Now, I can break this integral up into two parts.

<br /> 0 = \int_C \mathrm{e}^{-z^2} \mathrm{d}z = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \mathrm{e}^{-x^2} \mathrm{d}x + \int_{\theta=0}^{\theta=\pi} \mathrm{e}^{-z^2} \mathrm{d}z<br />

Or...

<br /> \int_{-\infty}^\infty \mathrm{e}^{-x^2} \mathrm{d}x &amp;= - \int_{\theta=0}^{\theta=\pi} \mathrm{e}^{-z^2} \mathrm{d}z = <br /> -\lim_{R\rightarrow \infty} \int_{0}^{\pi} \mathrm{e}^{-R^2 \exp(2\mathrm{i}\theta)}\cdot \mathrm{i} R \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\theta} \mathrm{d}\theta \stackrel{?}{=} \sqrt{\pi}<br />

I know the answer should be \sqrt{\pi}...so the RHS must give this result! But it does not...at least, I have convinced myself that the RHS actually goes to zero. The exponential dominates the linear term, so in the limit as R goes to infinity, the RHS equals zero.

How can this be...it seems I have shown that the gaussian integral is zero.

I should cry.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The terrible mistake have you made is the Gaussian diverges to infinity on the arc. You could show that all the integrals of the Gaussian from 0 to points r*exp(i theta) are equal when sin(theta)<=cos(theta). This won't answer any thing though as you would still need to calculate one such integral. I feel that this integral is not best done by contour integration (though it is possible and I have seen it done). There are other easier ways.
 
lurflurf said:
The terrible mistake have you made is the Gaussian diverges to infinity on the arc.
...which becomes painfully obvious when I include the effect of the oscillations. It is true that R->infinity makes exp(-R^2 exp(2*I*theta)) very large...but the oscillation causes it to go back and forth between +infinity and -infinity.

It seems that no matter which contour I pick (as far as infinite semi-circles go), I will have this issue. At iR and -iR, e^(-z^2) will have trouble. Thus, it seems that my contour CANNOT be anything that goes to infinity in the imaginary part.

I know that the Guassian integral can be done easily in polar coordinates...that doesn't concern me. I _want_ to do it when complex integration. So how do you do it?
 
This page about statistics
http://www.york.ac.uk/depts/maths/histstat/
has an article called Information on the History of the Normal Law
in which the desired integral is found 7 ways. #7 uses contour integration
In specific the function f(z)=exp(pi i z^2)/sin(pi z) is integrated on the parallelogram with vertices +-1/2+-Rexp(pi i/4) where R goes to infinity.
Also the oct 98' issue of the American Mathematical Monthly has an article on this integral (actually an integral that this one is a special case of).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K