Gaussian to MKS Four-vector Conversion

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Born2bwire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gaussian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on converting four-vectors from Gaussian units to MKS (Meter-Kilogram-Second) units, particularly in the context of special relativity. Users reference Jackson's appendix for conversion guidelines, highlighting the necessity of adjusting both sides of equations, such as \(\nabla\cdot\mathbf{E} = 4\pi\rho\) to \(\nabla\cdot\mathbf{E} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}\). The four-current and four-potential in MKS are defined as \(A^\alpha = \left(\frac{\Phi}{c}, \ \mathbf{A}\right)\) and \(J^\alpha = \left(\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}, \ \mu_0 \mathbf{J}\right)\). Understanding these conversions requires familiarity with the underlying equations and conventions of both unit systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity principles
  • Familiarity with Gaussian and MKS unit systems
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic field equations
  • Basic grasp of four-vectors in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Jackson's appendix on unit conversions in detail
  • Learn about the implications of \(\epsilon_0\) and \(\mu_0\) in electromagnetic theory
  • Explore the derivation of four-current and four-potential in MKS units
  • Investigate the differences in conventions between Gaussian and MKS units
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those working in theoretical physics and electromagnetism, as well as students studying special relativity and unit conversions in physics.

Born2bwire
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,780
Reaction score
24
Is there a straightforward way to determine a given four-vector in MKS units? Our system of units is MKS but I need to use some results from special relativity and of course all the sources use Gaussian units. Jackson has a simple chart in his appendix on converting between the two systems, but it seems to require knowledge of both a left hand and right hand side of the equation. That is,

\nabla\cdot\mathbf{E} = 4\pi\rho \quad \rightarrow \quad \nabla\cdot\mathbf{E} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}

The proper conversion here requires you to change units on both sides of the equation to get the correct MKS version. So when I see on Wikipedia and Weisstein's sites that the four-current and four-potential in MKS are:

A^\alpha = \left(\frac{\Phi}{c}, \ \mathbf{A}\right)
J^\alpha = \left(\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}, \ \mu_0 \mathbf{J}\right)

I can't figure out how you would derive the conversion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Born2bwire said:
I can't figure out how you would derive the conversion

I don't think you can "derive" the conversion without looking at the equations. The different systems of units involve different conventions for how the units are "divided up" between the fields/potentials, the sources, and arbitrary constants. The only way to know what those conventions are is to look at the equations in both systems of units.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
972
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
994
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K