Gaussian to MKS Four-vector Conversion

  • Thread starter Born2bwire
  • Start date
  • #1
Born2bwire
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,779
18

Main Question or Discussion Point

Is there a straightforward way to determine a given four-vector in MKS units? Our system of units is MKS but I need to use some results from special relativity and of course all the sources use Gaussian units. Jackson has a simple chart in his appendix on converting between the two systems, but it seems to require knowledge of both a left hand and right hand side of the equation. That is,

[tex]\nabla\cdot\mathbf{E} = 4\pi\rho \quad \rightarrow \quad \nabla\cdot\mathbf{E} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0} [/tex]

The proper conversion here requires you to change units on both sides of the equation to get the correct MKS version. So when I see on Wikipedia and Weisstein's sites that the four-current and four-potential in MKS are:

[tex] A^\alpha = \left(\frac{\Phi}{c}, \ \mathbf{A}\right) [/tex]
[tex] J^\alpha = \left(\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}, \ \mu_0 \mathbf{J}\right) [/tex]

I can't figure out how you would derive the conversion.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
PeterDonis
Mentor
Insights Author
2019 Award
30,094
9,270
I can't figure out how you would derive the conversion
I don't think you can "derive" the conversion without looking at the equations. The different systems of units involve different conventions for how the units are "divided up" between the fields/potentials, the sources, and arbitrary constants. The only way to know what those conventions are is to look at the equations in both systems of units.
 

Related Threads on Gaussian to MKS Four-vector Conversion

  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
626
Replies
21
Views
397
Replies
11
Views
807
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
20K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
461
Top