Gauss's law on a charged sheet.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the electric field produced by a uniformly charged sheet with a specified charge density. The subject area pertains to electrostatics and Gauss's law.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply Gauss's law to calculate the electric field but encounters a discrepancy with the expected answer from a textbook. Some participants question the units of charge density used in the calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring potential reasons for the difference in results. Some guidance has been offered regarding the possibility of a unit conversion issue, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted uncertainty regarding the charge density units, with suggestions that it may have been intended as pC/cm2 rather than pC/m2.

pondzo
Messages
168
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



find the field produced by a uniformly charged sheet carrying 87 pC/m2

Homework Equations



[itex]\oint \vec{E}.d\vec{A}[/itex] = qenclosed/[itex]\epsilon[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[itex]\Phi[/itex]= [itex]\sigma[/itex]A/[itex]\epsilon[/itex]
[itex]\Phi[/itex]=[itex]\oint E.dA[/itex] = ## E(2A) ##

2EA= [itex]\sigma[/itex]A/[itex]\epsilon[/itex]
E = [itex]\sigma[/itex]/(2[itex]\epsilon[/itex]) = 4.92 N/C where I use 8.85*10-12 for [itex]\epsilon[/itex] (this has been the value used through the book)
However the book says the answer is 49 kN/C
could someone point out my error? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer looks OK to me. What book are you using?
 
Since you are off (from the book's answer) by 104, I wonder if the charge density was meant to be in pC/cm2, not pC/m2.
 
I'm using Richard Wolfson's: essential university physics 2nd edition, ch 21 qn 33.
 
yeah that might be the problem, as i have seen similar qns to this one online but they use pC/cm^2 instead of pC/m^2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K