Gauss's Law Problem - Spherical Shell with Non-uniform Charge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a Gauss's Law problem involving a spherical shell with a non-uniform charge distribution. The inner radius is 0.30 m and the outer radius is 1.00 m, with a uniform electric field of 28 N/C inside the shell. The first part of the problem, determining the charge per unit area on the inner surface, was successfully solved using Gauss's Law. The second part, finding the charge per unit volume within the shell, required differentiation of the charge function and consideration of the non-uniform charge density, leading to the correct formulation of the volumetric charge density.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law and its applications
  • Familiarity with electric fields and charge distributions
  • Basic calculus, particularly differentiation
  • Knowledge of spherical geometry and volume calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the local form of Gauss's Law: ∇ · E = ρ/ε
  • Explore the implications of non-uniform charge distributions in electrostatics
  • Learn about electric field calculations in spherical coordinates
  • Review advanced calculus techniques for solving physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students of electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of Gauss's Law and charge distributions in spherical geometries.

MichelCarroll
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a spherical shell with inner radius r1=0.30 m and outer radius r2=1.00 m. The hollow inside the shell contains no charge; and charge is distributed on the inside surface of the shell and within the shell itself, such that the electrical field inside the shell itself is everywhere outward pointing and of uniform constant magnitude 28 N/C.

a) What is the charge per unit area on the inner surface at r=r1?

b) What is the charge per unit volume at radius r=0.65 m (within the material of the shell)?

Homework Equations



\phiₑ = \oint E · dA = Q/\epsilonₒ
area of sphere = 4πr^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I managed to get the a) part of the question using Gauss's Law. I made the Gaussian surface directly on the inner surface of the sphere (an infinitesimally small thickness, you could say). Since the electric field is constant everywhere on the surface, I could rewrite the equation as:

E4πr^2\epsilonₒ = Q

Since I'm looking for the charge per unit area, I rewrote it like this, and got the right answer:

\mu = Q/A = q/(4πr^2)
\mu = E\epsilonₒ

For the b) part of the question, I'm really struggling.

What I tried to do this: Since the volumetric charge density is ρ = Q/V, we could say that for an infinitesimally small volume, ρ = dQ/dV.

From this logic, I rewrote my equation for charge in terms of volume instead of radius. Then, I wanted to take the derivative of this function in terms of volume. Then, I reformulated the function in terms of radius. Here's my steps:

Q = E4πr^2\epsilonₒ
V = (4/3)πr^3
r = \sqrt[3]{3V/4π}
Q = E4π(3V/4π)^(2/3)\epsilonₒ
dQ/dV = 2πr^2E\epsilonₒ/r

It's possible that my calculus got rusty, but this function is not giving me the right answer.

Can somebody lead me in the right direction please?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first equation is correct and not only does it tell you the total charge on the inner surface of the shell, it also tells you the total charge inside any concentric sphere of any radius inside the shell. (Can you see why?)

Where you have gone wrong is to introduce the equation for the volume of a sphere. This is not relevant as the charge density within the shell is not uniform. What you must do is differentiate the first equation to find the total charge within a thin shell of thickness δr; then divide by the volume of the shell to get the charge per unit volume.
 
Thanks for your help. I think I understand. Here's my steps:

Differentiating the function for charge to find the charge inside a thin layer of the shell of thickness dr:

Q = E4πr²\epsilonₒ
dQ/dr = 8πrE\epsilonₒ

Finding the volume of a thin spherical shell of thickness dr: (between "r" and "r+dr")

dV = (4/3)π( (r + dr)³ - r³ )
dV = (4/3)π( 3r²dr + 3rdr² + dr³ ) (ignoring 3rdr² and dr³ because they are very small)
dV = 4πr² dr

Swapping dr for dV in the first equation:

dQ/dV = 2E\epsilonₒ/r = ρ

Is this correct?
 
If you are allowed to use the local form of Gauß's Law,
\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{E}=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon}
the whole thing becomes much easier!
 
vanhees71 said:
If you are allowed to use the local form of Gauß's Law,
\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{E}=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon}
the whole thing becomes much easier!

Unfortunately haven't learned that form yet though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
675
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
13K