Gauss's Law vs Coulomb's law problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the electric field at point P due to a thin sheet shaped as an annular semicircle with a positive surface charge density. The discussion centers around the application of Gauss's Law and Coulomb's Law in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of Gauss's Law and question whether the electric flux can be assumed to be zero based on the charge enclosed. There is consideration of using Coulomb's Law instead, with suggestions to integrate the electric fields from the semicircular sheet and cavity.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest that Coulomb's Law is more appropriate due to the lack of symmetry for Gauss's Law. There is acknowledgment that the electric field can be non-zero even if the flux is zero through a Gaussian surface. The discussion has led to insights about the symmetry of the problem and its implications for calculating the electric field.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem's symmetry affects the choice of method for calculating the electric field, and there is mention of the total charge being derived from the surface charge density and area of the sheet.

yeshuamo
Messages
39
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


A thin sheet in the shape of an annular semicircle has a positive surface charge density +σ as shown. What is the electric field at point P?

Here is an illustration of the problem:
http://postimg.org/image/630bpqwan/

Homework Equations


Gauss's Law:
φ=Qenclosed/ε0
φ=∫E⋅dA
Qenclosed=ε0*∫E⋅dA

Coulomb's Law:
E=(1/(4πε0))(Σq/(r2))

The Attempt at a Solution


If I draw a gaussian surface somewhere between the point P and the radius a, the charge enclosed would be zero. Can I assume that this would mean that the electric flux through that surface is zero, and, by extension, the electric field experienced at point P is zero, too?

If I'm wrong about the Gauss's law approach, should I instead use a Coulomb's law approach and integrate the electric field generated by the semicircular sheet, minus the electric field generated by the semicircular cavity?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yeshuamo said:

Homework Statement


A thin sheet in the shape of an annular semicircle has a positive surface charge density +σ as shown. What is the electric field at point P?

Here is an illustration of the problem:
http://postimg.org/image/630bpqwan/

Homework Equations


Gauss's Law:
φ=Qenclosed/ε0
φ=∫E⋅dA
Qenclosed=ε0*∫E⋅dA

Coulomb's Law:
E=(1/(4πε0))(Σq/(r2))

The Attempt at a Solution


If I draw a gaussian surface somewhere between the point P and the radius a, the charge enclosed would be zero. Can I assume that this would mean that the electric flux through that surface is zero, and, by extension, the electric field experienced at point P is zero, too?

If I'm wrong about the Gauss's law approach, should I instead use a Coulomb's law approach and integrate the electric field generated by the semicircular sheet, minus the electric field generated by the semicircular cavity?

Thank you.
The short answer is to use Coulomb's Law.

The flux can be zero through some surface without the electric field being zero anywhere on that surface.
 
there is no symmetry that permits efficient use of gauss's law in this problem. the symmetry is much better suited for coulomb's law. you will have some components that cancel out due to the symmetry.
 
SammyS said:
The short answer is to use Coulomb's Law.

The flux can be zero through some surface without the electric field being zero anywhere on that surface.

cpsinkule said:
there is no symmetry that permits efficient use of gauss's law in this problem. the symmetry is much better suited for coulomb's law. you will have some components that cancel out due to the symmetry.

The symmetry factor makes this sensible. Thank you! I found the total charge of the thin sheet from the product of σ by its area, and used that total charge in the Coulomb's equation for electric field. And in polar coordinates, you were right, things canceled.

Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K