MHB Gay-Lussac's Law of combining volumes

  • Thread starter Thread starter markosheehan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Volumes
Click For Summary
The discussion confirms that the reaction of 50 cm³ of nitrogen with 150 cm³ of hydrogen to produce 100 cm³ of ammonia aligns with Gay-Lussac's Law of combining volumes. According to this law, the volumes of gases involved in a chemical reaction are in simple ratios that correspond to the ratios of their molecular quantities. In this case, the ratio of nitrogen to hydrogen to ammonia is 1:3:2, which matches the provided volumes. Thus, the formation of 100 cm³ of ammonia from the given gases is consistent with Gay-Lussac's principles. The conclusion is that the reaction adheres to the law as expected.
markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
50 cm^3 of nitrogen combine with 150 cm^3 of hydrogen gas to form 100 cm^3 of ammonia. Does this agree with gay lussacs law of combing volumes?. Explain your answer.

i feel the answer is yes but I can not give the reason why?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
markosheehan said:
50 cm^3 of nitrogen combine with 150 cm^3 of hydrogen gas to form 100 cm^3 of ammonia. Does this agree with gay lussacs law of combing volumes?. Explain your answer.

i feel the answer is yes but I can not give the reason why?

The reaction is:
$$\ce{N2 + 3H2 \to 2NH3}$$

Gay-Lussac says that the ratio of molecules corresponds to the ratio of volumes of gasses.
That is:
$$1:3:2 = 50 \text{ cm}^3 : 150 \text{ cm}^3 : 100 \text{ cm}^3$$
Therefore the $100 \text{ cm}^3$ of ammonia does indeed agree with Gay-Lussac's law.
 
I like Serena said:
The reaction is:
$$\ce{N2 + 3H2 \to 2NH3}$$

Gay-Lussac says that the ratio of molecules corresponds to the ratio of volumes of gasses.
That is:
$$1:3:2 = 50 \text{ cm}^3 : 150 \text{ cm}^3 : 100 \text{ cm}^3$$
Therefore the $100 \text{ cm}^3$ of ammonia does indeed agree with Gay-Lussac's law.
thank you very much
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K