Gear train torque / power and load?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the input and output power and torque for a gear train consisting of four spur gears. Participants are focused on the efficiency of the gear train and the impact of frictional resistance on power calculations. The context is primarily homework-related, involving theoretical and practical aspects of gear mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster calculates input power, output power, and efficiency based on their gear train design, arriving at an efficiency of 98%.
  • Another participant suggests that power losses in each gear shaft should be calculated as angular velocity multiplied by frictional torque, leading to a total loss of approximately 430W.
  • This participant calculates the input power required to be 8808W, resulting in an efficiency of 95%.
  • The original poster expresses appreciation for the second participant's response and indicates a willingness to adopt their approach.
  • Another participant questions the discrepancy in efficiency calculations, indicating that there are differing results among participants.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the efficiency of the gear train, as calculations yield different results (98% vs. 95%). The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct approach to calculating input and output power and efficiency.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of power and efficiency in the context of the gear train, as well as the impact of frictional losses on the overall calculations.

LDC1972
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is a final hurdle of a long question designing a simple gear train. That is done but now am not sure of my calculations for power in / out and torque in and out, so hopefully someone can help?

OK - I have 4 spur gears inline, Gear A = 100 rpm 80 Teeth (input motor - unknown power?)
Gear B = 160 rpm 50 Teeth (idler)
Gear C = 160 rpm 50 Teeth (idler)
Gear D = 400 rpm 20 Teeth (output against a load of 200 Nm)
And ALL shafts carry a frictional resistance of 5 Nm

1/ What is the input power at shaft 1 (gear A)?
2/ What is the efficiency percentage?

Homework Equations



P = TW
T = P/W
T1 x W1 = P input

The Attempt at a Solution



I have done the following:

(TA x WA) - (TB x WB) - (TC - WC) - (TD - WD) = ZERO
And TA x WA = Power input

Convert the rpm to rad s:
Gear A = 100 rpm = 10.47197551 rad s
Gears B and C = 160 rpm = 16.75516082 rad s
Gear D = 400 rpm = 41.88790205 rad s

Input Power (Pi) = (TB x WB) + (TC x WC) + (TD + WD)
= (5 Nm x 16.75516082 rad s) + (5 Nm x 16.75516082 rad s) + (5 Nm + 200
Nm x 41.88790205 rad s)
Input Power = 8.755 Kw

Torque in = Input power / WA = 836 Nm
Torque out = 205 Nm
Power out = TW = 205 Nm x 41.88790205 rad s) = 8.587 Kw

Efficiency = Output power / Input power = 98 %


Does this look correctly tackled? Any advice very welcome!

I like the 205 Nm out as the gear ratio is 1 : 4 and the output is 1/4 input, which makes sense?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
As I see it the power lost in each gear shaft will be it's angular velocity * frictional torque. So for each shaft the losses are..

Gear A = 100 rpm = 10.47 rads/s then 10.47 * 5Nm = 52.4W
Gear B = 160 rpm = 16.76 rads/s then 16.76 * 5NM = 83.8W
Gear C = 160 rpm = 16.76 rads/s then 16.76 * 5Nm = 83.8W
Gear D = 400 rpm = 41.89 rads/s then 41.89 * 5Nm = 209.5W

Add it up and Total lost in the gearbox = 430W approx.

Power in must = Power Out + losses in gearbox

Power out = 41.89 * 200 = 8378W
So
Power in = 8378 + 430 = 8808W

Efficiency (%) = 100 * Power Out/Power In = 100* 8378/8808 = 95%

Not really my field but I can't see anything I've missed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you so much!

A concise and helpful reply - I've 'thanked' you.

I think 95% sounds much more realistic, so I'll take a look and do it your way.

Thanks again!
 
LDC1972 following this answer and was it correct? I found the efficiency to be different to yours...
 
Any help going folks?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
23K
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K