Gen Physics Book for Right-Brained, Visual Learners?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding suitable physics textbooks and learning methods for a predominantly right-brained, visual learner struggling with traditional lecture formats in an accelerated summer physics course. Participants share their experiences and suggestions for alternative resources and strategies to enhance understanding of physics concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses frustration with traditional lecture methods and seeks recommendations for textbooks or supplementary materials that cater to visual learners.
  • Another participant suggests that popular physics texts like Serway, Young, Knight, and Halliday have excellent illustrations and recommends reading the material before class to better engage during lectures.
  • A different participant mentions the availability of video lectures and online resources, advocating for their use to prepare for classes and to clarify concepts.
  • The original poster clarifies their situation, stating they are not majoring in physics and are struggling with the required textbook, while also expressing frustration with the differing terminology used by their professor compared to other resources.
  • One participant acknowledges the misunderstanding in their previous post and reiterates the importance of finding a textbook that resonates with the learner's style.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need for alternative learning resources and methods, but there are differing opinions on the effectiveness of specific textbooks and the best approach to studying physics. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best materials for visual learners.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with different textbooks and resources, indicating that personal preference plays a significant role in understanding physics material. There are also references to the challenges of adapting to different teaching styles and terminologies.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students who identify as visual learners or those struggling with traditional physics instruction methods, as well as individuals seeking alternative resources for understanding physics concepts.

RtBrndVisLrnr
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
My screen name says it all, and I am desperate for help - trying to teach myself through this accelerated summer class is clearly not working with the materials & methods I have been using.

Any suggestions for a Physics textbook, or supplementary book, alternate tutoring/learning methods for a predominantly right-brained, visual, global learner will be SO appreciated!

My professor only lectures and works problems on the white board. While I appreciate his vast knowledge, that doesn't help me, as I am frantically scribbling down notes, barely hearing what he's currently saying, and not really able to look at the board at all to see the actual math that is going on. I've spoken to him about bringing in power points, but apparently that's not his thing.

I have a ~3.7 gpa - but barely pulled a C- in Physics I, and need to redeem myself for Phys II. I am also Taking Chem I & II at the same time this summer, which, I know, I'm nuts for taking 4 math-heavy classes in 12 weeks - but if I can pull it off I will shave a whole YEAR off my grad date, which (now back in school in my 30's) is a HUGE savings in time & money!

Thanks again for any & all help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IMO all of the popular physics texts --- Serway, Young, Knight, Halliday --- have excellent illustrations.

What jumps out at me from your post, though, is your not hearing and seeing the lecture material as you frantically try to write your notes.

I think it's easy to see why you got a C-. NOBODY, except a real genius, can learn physics by that method.

What you *should* be doing is reading the material BEFORE the class, from more than one of the above texts (and I always recommend you buy cheap older used editions, which are just as good as new ones) if that's what it takes for you to understand it. IMO anyone who has any business majoring in physics should be able to read and understand a freshman physics text, on his own, well enough to do the worked examples in the text.

You should not use the lectures to learn the material from scratch. You should use them as an opportunity to ask about points that you still aren't sure about, or to see another approach to a formula's derivation, or to find out what points your prof thinks are the most important. If you have already read the material, you won't be afraid to ask about something that seems wrong. Maybe the prof made a mistake. Maybe he didn't, but either way, it can't hurt to have him remember you as someone who paid attention and asked intelligent questions, especially if you end up on the borderline between two grades.

Yes, it will take several hours per lecture to prepare. That's why they say physics is hard. But if you're going to succeed in physics, you have to put that kind of time in, no matter what. The only question is whether you do it before or after the lectures.

If you do it before the lectures, you will be able to use your holistic approach and enjoy the lecture, jotting down an occasional note. If you do it after the lectures, then you are pretty much wasting your time during the lecture, as you have found out.
 
Last edited:
There are tons of video lectures in the learning materials section of this website.
With these you can pause etc... Furthermore you should go online & download the
slides (pdf, powerpoint etc...) that lecturers use during classes. Get a few different
sources. Most likely virtually everything you're going to do in class you can get on
the internet, you should prepare using video lectures, online notes & powerpoints of
class slides from other colleges & then use the lectures as revision & time to ask the
kinds of questions you would like answered.
 
Thank you everyone for the positive, proactive pieces of information provided from all parties; however, the judgmental attitude from “brocks” was very unnecessary. Were it not for “sponsoredwalk”, I may have just deleted my profile here altogether.

I had tried to make my initial mssg short and sweet, but apparently that made me look like a slacker. For the record, I am NOT majoring in physics. I have tried to read the material before class, but I am not working well with the book that is (disliked by my Prof, but) required by the college (Physics- James S. Walker), which is why I was asking if anyone out there who also learns material in the *same way I do* appreciated one author's *visual* rendition of the material over the other.

I asked the Prof which book he prefers (Giancoli), and will prob pick up a version of that, however it did not receive as good a review as University Physics by Young/Freedman. I have watched other online videos/tutorials and have downloaded power points from other colleges, but it does not always sync up with what my professor emphasizes (or sometimes he uses totally different terminology altogether), which then serves only to confuse me, as I come in with one train of thought and then must switch to another, which I can handle in all subjects EXCEPT math.

I am exhausted and frustrated, but trying to make the best of a very tough situation (Physics I/Chem I & Physics II/Chem II all in 12 weeks). I currently have a 3.7 in Chem II, I can fly through 1000+ page novels in days, can learn languages & have done very well in Psych, Soc, History & Bio sciences, I even used to be good at geometry (..when I took it back in 1989!). I’m not a genius, but I do try & bust my butt, because education is a gift & I have goals to achieve & life is too short & precious to waste. I know I can grasp this if I just found the means to make it click with me. I understand physics is hard, & I *know* I need to work harder ( hence why I am here on this site) .. but I want to work SMARTER, not just harder.

Thank you again for all the positive assistance given. No need to reply further, this topic is closed.
 
Well, I am sorry that you took my post as judgmental. I meant it to be helpful, and like you, I tried to make it concise, so it may have come off as more imperative than I intended.

My basic point was that reading the book before the lectures, rather than after them, IS working smarter.

Oh, I think I see what upset you --- the part about anybody majoring in physics should be able to understand a freshman text. Yeah, I could have put that better.

If you look at my posts in other threads, you will see that my constant theme is that people should buy used (cheap) copies of as many different texts as it takes for them to understand the material (see, for example, the "Linear Algebra book" thread right below this one). I didn't mean there's something wrong with you if you don't understand it, I meant you need to find a text you DO understand. I am the world's foremost example of someone whose understanding depends to a very large extent on finding an author whose style I like.

Sorry for the misunderstanding.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Brocks :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
12K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K