General Formula for Acceleration of a Disk Rolling Down an Incline

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling the acceleration of a disk rolling down an incline with varying hole sizes. The moment of inertia is noted as 1/2m(a^2 + b^2), and the net force equation is established as mgsin(θ) - F (friction) = ma. The relationship between angular acceleration and linear acceleration is crucial, expressed as a = αR, where R is the radius of the disk. The final formula provided is gsin(θ)/(1/2(a/b)^2 + 3/2), but the user struggles with determining the angular acceleration value. Clarification on the radius of the disk in relation to the hole size is essential for accurate calculations.
theboomking
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

For an experiment I am writing up I have to model the acceleration of a disk rolling down an incline (at an angle of θ to the ground) with various hole sizes in the center.


A am aware that the moment of inertia for this object is given by 1/2m(a^2 + b^2) and that the net force vector down the incline will be given by mgsin(θ) - F (friction)= ma

I am also aware that the torque force will be equal to the moment of inertia times the angular acceleration, which will also be equal to the force of friction times b. However I am not very familiar with angular acceleration and cannot work out what the value should be. The final formula my teacher gave me looks like this

gsin(θ)/ (1/2(a/b)^2 + 3/2)


I've tried all substituting an expression for the force of friction into the net force value, but can't get it to work as I am not sure of the angular acceleration value. Can anybody help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need a relation between angular acceleration and linear acceleration which depends on the radius of the disk. Assuming no slip condition,we have a=αR, where a is the linear acceleration, α is the angular acceleration, and R is the radius of the disk. Based on what you said it seems that R = b, but you should make sure that is indeed correct. It depends on the exact geometry of your disk and experimental set up.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K