MHB General motion in a straight line.

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the motion of a bird returning to point A after traveling to point B. The user determined the time T as approximately 4.25 seconds using the integral of a velocity function, which resulted in a zero net displacement. The graph of velocity versus time shows that the areas above and below the x-axis cancel each other out, confirming the return to the starting point. The method involved solving a cubic equation derived from the integrated velocity function. Overall, the calculations and graphical analysis support the conclusion that the bird returns to point A.
Shah 72
MHB
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
20210609_222002.jpg

In q(c) I calculated the distance using t= 4.25 S . I get S=-3.23×10^-3
I added 5.78m to this which is the distance between A and B, I get 5.78m. Is this the correct method to prove that the bird returns to A. Pls help
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$\displaystyle \dfrac{1}{12}\int_0^T 3t^3-16t^2-10t+60 \, dt = 0$

$T = \dfrac{\sqrt{1105}+5}{9} \approx 4.25$

in the attached graph of velocity vs time ...

shaded area above the x-axis = displacement from A to B

shaded area below the x-axis = displacement from B to A

the two shaded areas sum to zero, indicating a return to the starting point, A

zero_Disp.png
 
skeeter said:
$\displaystyle \dfrac{1}{12}\int_0^T 3t^3-16t^2-10t+60 \, dt = 0$

$T = \dfrac{\sqrt{1105}+5}{9} \approx 4.25$

in the attached graph of velocity vs time ...

shaded area above the x-axis = displacement from A to B

shaded area below the x-axis = displacement from B to A

the two shaded areas sum to zero, indicating a return to the starting point, A

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/11188
Thanks so much!
 
skeeter said:
$\displaystyle \dfrac{1}{12}\int_0^T 3t^3-16t^2-10t+60 \, dt = 0$

$T = \dfrac{\sqrt{1105}+5}{9} \approx 4.25$

in the attached graph of velocity vs time ...

shaded area above the x-axis = displacement from A to B

shaded area below the x-axis = displacement from B to A

the two shaded areas sum to zero, indicating a return to the starting point, A

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/11188
Can I pls ask you
skeeter said:
$\displaystyle \dfrac{1}{12}\int_0^T 3t^3-16t^2-10t+60 \, dt = 0$

$T = \dfrac{\sqrt{1105}+5}{9} \approx 4.25$

in the attached graph of velocity vs time ...

shaded area above the x-axis = displacement from A to B

shaded area below the x-axis = displacement from B to A

the two shaded areas sum to zero, indicating a return to the starting point, A

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/11188
Can you pls tell me how did you calculate that? Did you solve the cubic equation? I don't understand how you got the equation sq root (1105).
 
I integrated the velocity function and evaluated it from 0 to T and set the result equal to zero.

$\dfrac{T}{12}\left(\dfrac{3T^3}{4} - \dfrac{16T^2}{3} - 5T+ 60\right) = 0$

ignored the T/12 factor & multiplied the terms inside the parentheses by 12 to clear the fractions …

$9T^3 - 64T^2 -60T+720 = 0$

I graphed the cubic on my calculator and found T = 6 was a zero, then used synthetic division to find the quadratic factor …

$(T-6)(9T^2-10T-120) = 0$

$T = \dfrac{10 \pm \sqrt{4420}}{18}$

discarding the negative value for T …

$T = \dfrac{10+2\sqrt{1105}}{18} = \dfrac{5+\sqrt{1105}}{9}$
 
skeeter said:
I integrated the velocity function and evaluated it from 0 to T and set the result equal to zero.

$\dfrac{T}{12}\left(\dfrac{3T^3}{4} - \dfrac{16T^2}{3} - 5T+ 60\right) = 0$

ignored the T/12 factor & multiplied the terms inside the parentheses by 12 to clear the fractions …

$9T^3 - 64T^2 -60T+720 = 0$

I graphed the cubic on my calculator and found T = 6 was a zero, then used synthetic division to find the quadratic factor …

$(T-6)(9T^2-10T-120) = 0$

$T = \dfrac{10 \pm \sqrt{4420}}{18}$

discarding the negative value for T …

$T = \dfrac{10+2\sqrt{1105}}{18} = \dfrac{5+\sqrt{1105}}{9}$
Thank you so much!
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
798
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
944
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K