MHB General motion in a straight line.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the motion of a bird returning to point A after traveling to point B. The user determined the time T as approximately 4.25 seconds using the integral of a velocity function, which resulted in a zero net displacement. The graph of velocity versus time shows that the areas above and below the x-axis cancel each other out, confirming the return to the starting point. The method involved solving a cubic equation derived from the integrated velocity function. Overall, the calculations and graphical analysis support the conclusion that the bird returns to point A.
Shah 72
MHB
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
20210609_222002.jpg

In q(c) I calculated the distance using t= 4.25 S . I get S=-3.23×10^-3
I added 5.78m to this which is the distance between A and B, I get 5.78m. Is this the correct method to prove that the bird returns to A. Pls help
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$\displaystyle \dfrac{1}{12}\int_0^T 3t^3-16t^2-10t+60 \, dt = 0$

$T = \dfrac{\sqrt{1105}+5}{9} \approx 4.25$

in the attached graph of velocity vs time ...

shaded area above the x-axis = displacement from A to B

shaded area below the x-axis = displacement from B to A

the two shaded areas sum to zero, indicating a return to the starting point, A

zero_Disp.png
 
skeeter said:
$\displaystyle \dfrac{1}{12}\int_0^T 3t^3-16t^2-10t+60 \, dt = 0$

$T = \dfrac{\sqrt{1105}+5}{9} \approx 4.25$

in the attached graph of velocity vs time ...

shaded area above the x-axis = displacement from A to B

shaded area below the x-axis = displacement from B to A

the two shaded areas sum to zero, indicating a return to the starting point, A

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/11188
Thanks so much!
 
skeeter said:
$\displaystyle \dfrac{1}{12}\int_0^T 3t^3-16t^2-10t+60 \, dt = 0$

$T = \dfrac{\sqrt{1105}+5}{9} \approx 4.25$

in the attached graph of velocity vs time ...

shaded area above the x-axis = displacement from A to B

shaded area below the x-axis = displacement from B to A

the two shaded areas sum to zero, indicating a return to the starting point, A

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/11188
Can I pls ask you
skeeter said:
$\displaystyle \dfrac{1}{12}\int_0^T 3t^3-16t^2-10t+60 \, dt = 0$

$T = \dfrac{\sqrt{1105}+5}{9} \approx 4.25$

in the attached graph of velocity vs time ...

shaded area above the x-axis = displacement from A to B

shaded area below the x-axis = displacement from B to A

the two shaded areas sum to zero, indicating a return to the starting point, A

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/11188
Can you pls tell me how did you calculate that? Did you solve the cubic equation? I don't understand how you got the equation sq root (1105).
 
I integrated the velocity function and evaluated it from 0 to T and set the result equal to zero.

$\dfrac{T}{12}\left(\dfrac{3T^3}{4} - \dfrac{16T^2}{3} - 5T+ 60\right) = 0$

ignored the T/12 factor & multiplied the terms inside the parentheses by 12 to clear the fractions …

$9T^3 - 64T^2 -60T+720 = 0$

I graphed the cubic on my calculator and found T = 6 was a zero, then used synthetic division to find the quadratic factor …

$(T-6)(9T^2-10T-120) = 0$

$T = \dfrac{10 \pm \sqrt{4420}}{18}$

discarding the negative value for T …

$T = \dfrac{10+2\sqrt{1105}}{18} = \dfrac{5+\sqrt{1105}}{9}$
 
skeeter said:
I integrated the velocity function and evaluated it from 0 to T and set the result equal to zero.

$\dfrac{T}{12}\left(\dfrac{3T^3}{4} - \dfrac{16T^2}{3} - 5T+ 60\right) = 0$

ignored the T/12 factor & multiplied the terms inside the parentheses by 12 to clear the fractions …

$9T^3 - 64T^2 -60T+720 = 0$

I graphed the cubic on my calculator and found T = 6 was a zero, then used synthetic division to find the quadratic factor …

$(T-6)(9T^2-10T-120) = 0$

$T = \dfrac{10 \pm \sqrt{4420}}{18}$

discarding the negative value for T …

$T = \dfrac{10+2\sqrt{1105}}{18} = \dfrac{5+\sqrt{1105}}{9}$
Thank you so much!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
775
Replies
2
Views
981
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
923
Replies
4
Views
987
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top