General Rel, deflected light around sun.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lengalicious
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General Light Sun
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
Lengalicious
Messages
162
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See Attachment

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



So basically I will not bother writing the derivation from my notes but ultimately it turns out an approximation of deflected light around a mass body is [tex]2\delta\phi=4GM/R[/tex] where R is distance of closest approach and M is mass of body.

Now what I am confused about is that calculating this deflection angle will give me a value with units of m2s-2, sooooo I should be getting a value with units arcseconds per century, how exactly does this work? Confused the heck out of me. .
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    11.3 KB · Views: 546
Physics news on Phys.org
Lengalicious said:
So basically I will not bother writing the derivation from my notes but ultimately it turns out an approximation of deflected light around a mass body is [tex]2\delta\phi=4GM/R[/tex] where R is distance of closest approach and M is mass of body.

Hello, Lengalicious.

You have left something out of the equation. Maybe in your notes you were using units where the speed of light is 1, but here you will want to use standard SI or cgs units.
 
TSny said:
Hello, Lengalicious.

You have left something out of the equation. Maybe in your notes your were using units where the speed of light is 1, but here you will want to use standard SI or cgs units.

I guess that's the only logical explanation, but if there was a missing factor of 1/c then I would still end up with ms-1 which just would not be convertible to arcseconds per century still. The deflection angle comes from the solution to a differential equation formed by conservation of energy for a particle in a gravitational potential with an extra general relativistic term. None of these terms contain a factor of c unless the general relativistic term does contain a hidden factor c=1 that my professor did not bother to specify for some reason.
 
TSny said:
If you are using units where c = 1, then also cn = 1 for any power.

I'm sure you can find the formula in SI units by doing a quick web search.

Yeh tried earlier with no success but after a quick research managed to find it, turns out its missing a factor of 1/c2 like you say, in any case will the value be in radians now?

Thanks for the heads up btw.