General Relativity And Quantum Mechanics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the discrepancies between General Relativity (GR) and Quantum Mechanics (QM), particularly in the context of the early universe where GR predicts singularities that have no counterpart in QM. Participants highlight that these theories operate in different domains rather than being outright contradictory. Despite ongoing efforts, a unified theory of quantum gravity remains elusive, with possibilities including the coexistence of both theories without a single "theory of everything" (TOE) or the dynamic relationship between gravity and quantum fields via hypothetical gravitons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity principles
  • Basic knowledge of Quantum Mechanics concepts
  • Familiarity with the concept of singularities in physics
  • Awareness of the challenges in developing a unified theory of quantum gravity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of singularities in General Relativity
  • Explore the concept of gravitons and their role in quantum gravity
  • Study existing theories attempting to unify GR and QM, such as string theory
  • Investigate the behavior of matter and energy in black holes from both GR and QM perspectives
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and students interested in theoretical physics, particularly those exploring the intersections of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics.

abercrombiems02
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone, I'm having some trouble finding the discrepancies between general relativity and quantum mechanics. Could someone please give me a dummy's version of how the two theories contradict each other. In general, I know that general relativity suggests that the prescence of mass and energy warp the curvurature of space-time. Also, quantum mechanics suggests the existence of discrete states as well as many other things. In what aspects do the two theories contradict each other. The most watered down version you can give me is perfectly fine. I'm an engineer and have not studied most of these more theoretical concepts. I've only been exposed to very very basic quantum mechanics and special relativity. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
abercrombiems02 said:
The most watered down version you can give me is perfectly fine.

The usual discrepancy between the two is in the very early universe, when predicted GR effects tend to infinity ("a singularity"). There is no analog to this state in QM.

I personally would say there is not so much a contradiction between the two, as that they apply over a slightly different domain. Despite the detemined and persistent efforts of top physicists, no consistent theory of unified quantum gravity has been forthcoming to date.

a. It is possible that GR and QM are both "correct"; but are not subsets of a single "theory of everything" (TOE).

b. It is also possible that both gravity and quantum fields are related dynamically via gravitons, but that there is no experimental possibility of demonstrating such within reach of future particle accelerators.

c. It is also possible that with some future adjustments, a good TOE will be discovered and eventually verified by experiment.
 
One area where these is a problem is the question of what happens inside a black hole. When applying QM and GR together mathematical nonsense results.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K