General Relativity by Hobson, Lasenby and Efstathiou

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The book "General Relativity" by Hobson, Lasenby, and Efstathiou is recognized for its intuitive approach to both the mathematics and physics of general relativity. Users in the discussion emphasize the importance of understanding one's background before determining if the book is suitable for them. Many have found the text to be well-written and effective for undergraduate students preparing for their first course in general relativity. Overall, it is considered a valuable resource for those with a foundational understanding of physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of undergraduate-level physics concepts
  • Familiarity with mathematical techniques used in physics
  • Knowledge of special relativity principles
  • Exposure to tensor calculus and differential geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore additional resources on tensor calculus for a deeper understanding
  • Review introductory materials on special relativity to solidify foundational concepts
  • Investigate supplementary texts on general relativity for varied perspectives
  • Engage with online courses or lectures on general relativity to enhance comprehension
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for undergraduate students, aspiring physicists, and educators seeking effective resources for teaching or learning general relativity.

What are your opinions on this book?

  • Lightly recommended

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Neutral(just OK)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lightly not recommended

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Strongly not recommended

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2
Joker93
Messages
502
Reaction score
37
Hello,
Is the book General Relativity by Hobson, Lasenby and Efstathiou good in the sense that is intuitive on the mathematics AND physics that it presents? Please vote and if you could also comment your opinion it would be much appreciated.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hasn't anybody used it?
 
Adam Landos said:
hasn't anybody used it?

Of course people have used it, but your post does't really invite helpful results. You neglect to tell us your background, or anything else for that matter. How are we then supposed to figure out whether this book is a good fit for you?
 
micromass said:
Of course people have used it, but your post does't really invite helpful results. You neglect to tell us your background, or anything else for that matter. How are we then supposed to figure out whether this book is a good fit for you?
I am just asking for general opinions. If it's well-written, intuitive, gives good explanations etc.
But if you need some background, I intend to enroll in my first GR course and I have the necessary background than an undergraduate student needs to tackle a first undergrad course in GR. I hope this helps and sorry if I was inaccurate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K