I General Relativity: Is it Local?

accdd
Messages
95
Reaction score
20
Spacetime is a differential manifold and at each point is attached a Minkowski spacetime.
There the laws of physics are the usual ones without gravity.
Gravity is the curvature of spacetime. To define the concept of curvature do we need to evaluate at least one neighborhood of point P? Is general relativity local?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As all so far successful relativistic field theories also GR is local, i.e., it's Lagrangian depends on the fields and its derivatives at a single spacetime point.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix, Orodruin, accdd and 1 other person
accdd said:
To define the concept of curvature do we need to evaluate at least one neighborhood of point P? Is general relativity local?
An infinitesimally small neighborhood suffices for that purpose, so yes, it's local.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and accdd
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Back
Top