General Relativity Prerequisites

Click For Summary
Before taking a course on General Relativity, particularly one using Schutz's "A First Course in General Relativity," students should be comfortable with several foundational topics in physics and mathematics. A solid understanding of special relativity, including Lorentz transformations and relativistic mechanics, is essential. Familiarity with differential geometry is highly beneficial, although some argue it shouldn't be a strict prerequisite, as the course may cover necessary mathematical concepts as needed. Knowledge of Lagrangian mechanics can also be advantageous, but not mandatory. Students should have a grasp of Euclidean vector calculus, ordinary and partial differential equations, and basic thermodynamics and hydrostatics. While some discussions suggest that a background in quantum mechanics is unnecessary for GR, others note that familiarity with various mathematical approaches can enhance overall intuition. Ultimately, the course is designed for physics undergraduates, and the instructor is expected to provide support in learning the required mathematics along the way.
the_kid
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
Generally speaking, what physics and math should one be comfortable with before taking a course on General Relativity? If it helps, the course will be using Shultz's A First Course in General Relativity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Schutz, without the "L".

Well, a thorough course on differential geometry (which already assumes real analysis and linear algebra) should be enough. Special relativity including electrodynamics and analytical mechanics (Lagrangians and less Hamiltonians) should also be ok to know beforehand.
 
I have Schutz's book as well. Though I've never gotten around to reading it, exactly because of the lack of prerequisite knowledge on the relevant mathematics.

I'm curious, would you just be getting started with differential geometry, or would you just be brushing up before reading Schutz?
 
I know very little differential geometry. Although the professor says he'll cover all of the required math as needed, I'm still wary. I have no problem with picking up math as I go (and I've done it before for other classes), I just feel this might be particularly difficult. Has anyone tried it before or taken a similar class?
 
the_kid said:
I know very little differential geometry. Although the professor says he'll cover all of the required math as needed, I'm still wary. I have no problem with picking up math as I go (and I've done it before for other classes), I just feel this might be particularly difficult. Has anyone tried it before or taken a similar class?

Presumably the course is for physics students, so it would be unreasonable to assume any of them have prior experience with differential geometry. The math will not be particularly difficult, but it might take a little bit of simmering to let it conceptually sink in. There's a lot of index manipulation and algebra in GR as well, so familiarity with tensors is a plus (but not necessary! Likely, it will be the first time working with these concepts for most of the students).

As previously mentioned, a familiar with lagrangian mechanics can be helpful (but again, not necessary). What you should have is a firm grasp of special relativity (at the conceptual level). When you likely re-learn everything in special relativity in terms of four-vectors and metrics it would be greatly beneficial if you were already familiar with all the results.
 
the_kid said:
Generally speaking, what physics and math should one be comfortable with before taking a course on General Relativity? If it helps, the course will be using Shultz's A First Course in General Relativity.

There are so many different approaches that you can't really speak "generally". In your case, you need the physics and maths necessary to understand Schutz. Schutz says in the preface what you should know. OK this is a bit general & vague, but no one here is going to give any more detailed advice (are they?) The best thing is to start reading Schutz and when/if you get stuck post questions here, or (better) ask your kind lecturer. (He must be kind if he's taking the trouble to give you the mathematics as you go along!)
 
Er, Schutz is a book for physics undergrads, so how could Differential Geometry be a prerequisite?

The preface states exactly what the prerequisites are:

Unlike most introductory texts, this one does not assume that the student has already studied electromagnetism in its manifestly relativistic formulation, the theory of electromagnetic waves, or fluid dynamics.
[...]
The student is assumed already to have studied: special relativity, including the Lorentz transformation and relativistic mechanics; Euclidean vector calculus; ordinary and simple partial differential equations; thermodynamics and hydrostatics; Newtonian gravity (simple stellar structure would be useful but not essential); and enough elementary quantum mechanics to know what a photon is.
 
Here's what the prof at a university who I asked about taking the course:

"...Besides quantum mechanics, I also ask students who want to take the class to know special relativity and electromagnetism on the advanced undergraduate level..."

By advanced undergraduate level he means at the level of Griffths.

Good luck.
 
Why would they have to know QM before being exposed to GR ?? Dubious idea.
 
  • #10
dextercioby said:
Why would they have to know QM before being exposed to GR ?? Dubious idea.

The math used in QM is different than the math used in E&M and classical mechanics.
It's about the math used in QM, not that you actually use QM in GR...
 
  • #11
romsofia said:
The math used in QM is different than the math used in E&M and classical mechanics.
It's about the math used in QM, not that you actually use QM in GR...

The math used in QM has nothing to do with the math used in GR
 
  • #12
zahero_2007 said:
The math used in QM has nothing to do with the math used in GR

Now, I know this may sounds crazy, but, if you've been exposed to more kinds of math, and different ways of dealing with equations, then MAYBE, just maybe, you'll have a LITTLE more intuition about other maths...

P.S. there is a reason one takes calculus before abstract algebra ;)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K