- #1

- 116

- 0

*A First Course in General Relativity*.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter the_kid
- Start date

- #1

- 116

- 0

- #2

- 13,055

- 604

Well, a thorough course on differential geometry (which already assumes real analysis and linear algebra) should be enough. Special relativity including electrodynamics and analytical mechanics (Lagrangians and less Hamiltonians) should also be ok to know beforehand.

- #3

- 71

- 0

I'm curious, would you just be getting started with differential geometry, or would you just be brushing up before reading Schutz?

- #4

- 116

- 0

- #5

Nabeshin

Science Advisor

- 2,205

- 16

Presumably the course is for physics students, so it would be unreasonable to assume any of them have prior experience with differential geometry. The math will not be particularly difficult, but it might take a little bit of simmering to let it conceptually sink in. There's a lot of index manipulation and algebra in GR as well, so familiarity with tensors is a plus (but not necessary! Likely, it will be the first time working with these concepts for most of the students).

As previously mentioned, a familiar with lagrangian mechanics can be helpful (but again, not necessary). What you should have is a firm grasp of special relativity (at the conceptual level). When you likely re-learn everything in special relativity in terms of four-vectors and metrics it would be greatly beneficial if you were already familiar with all the results.

- #6

- 1,198

- 26

A First Course in General Relativity.

There are so many different approaches that you can't really speak "generally". In your case, you need the physics and maths necessary to understand Schutz. Schutz says in the preface what you should know. OK this is a bit general & vague, but no one here is going to give any more detailed advice (are they?) The best thing is to start reading Schutz and when/if you get stuck post questions here, or (better) ask your kind lecturer. (He must be kind if he's taking the trouble to give you the mathematics as you go along!)

- #7

- 836

- 13

The preface states exactly what the prerequisites are:

Unlike most introductory texts, this one does not assume that the student has already studied electromagnetism in its manifestly relativistic formulation, the theory of electromagnetic waves, or fluid dynamics.

[...]

The student is assumed already to have studied: special relativity, including the Lorentz transformation and relativistic mechanics; Euclidean vector calculus; ordinary and simple partial differential equations; thermodynamics and hydrostatics; Newtonian gravity (simple stellar structure would be useful but not essential); and enough elementary quantum mechanics to know what a photon is.

- #8

- 475

- 148

"...Besides quantum mechanics, I also ask students who want to take the class to know special relativity and electromagnetism on the advanced undergraduate level..."

By advanced undergraduate level he means at the level of Griffths.

Good luck.

- #9

- 13,055

- 604

Why would they have to know QM before being exposed to GR ?? Dubious idea.

- #10

- 475

- 148

Why would they have to know QM before being exposed to GR ?? Dubious idea.

The math used in QM is different than the math used in E&M and classical mechanics.

It's about the math used in QM, not that you actually use QM in GR...

- #11

- 74

- 0

The math used in QM is different than the math used in E&M and classical mechanics.

It's about the math used in QM, not that you actually use QM in GR...

The math used in QM has nothing to do with the math used in GR

- #12

- 475

- 148

The math used in QM has nothing to do with the math used in GR

Now, I know this may sounds crazy, but, if you've been exposed to more kinds of math, and different ways of dealing with equations, then MAYBE, just maybe, you'll have a LITTLE more intuition about other maths...

P.S. there is a reason one takes calculus before abstract algebra ;)

Share:

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 779